From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: narrowing considered harmful Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:00:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <51AC4543.1000508@easy-emacs.de> <51AC4C03.7050504@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371214872 9426 80.91.229.3 (14 Jun 2013 13:01:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 14 15:01:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UnTcq-0000Cs-KY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:01:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35344 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnTcq-0003DD-7a for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:01:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnTcb-0003Bh-V3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:00:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnTca-0000FC-JP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:00:53 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:38995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnTca-0000F7-79 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:00:52 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r5ED0o0l013632; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:00:50 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 74354B4106; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:00:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:54:23 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4609=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4609> : streams <981628> : uri <1447629> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:91549 Archived-At: > Do you think it is a good idea to add a macro along these lines: > (defmacro with-markers (markerlist &rest body) I don't see the point. It only saves you the calls to `copy-marker'. Stefan