From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: (next-error) and buffer popups Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:38:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9bbb76e9-381c-47e7-ae73-1901b493d28a@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431970742 18146 80.91.229.3 (18 May 2015 17:39:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:39:02 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 18 19:38:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YuP08-0005fq-MJ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:38:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42319 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuP08-0003xi-6q for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOzy-0003xc-7T for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:38:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOzv-0004wM-2H for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:38:42 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43895) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOzu-0004wF-Rj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:38:38 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOzs-0005YE-IW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:38:36 +0200 Original-Received: from 206-248-179-22.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.179.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:38:36 +0200 Original-Received: from monnier by 206-248-179-22.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:38:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 206-248-179-22.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kzei+cU6whMcupf2pb9kevvMZ4c= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:104480 Archived-At: > They are separate displays, but that shouldn't matter here because the > behaviour is the same even if two frames are positioned to be in the same > monitor (or, indeed, if I only have one monitor and two frames). It looks like it's indeed not to source of your problem. The first thing to check is your setting for display-buffer-reuse-frames. The separate displays may still matter in the end, because Emacs is also designed to work in conditions where frames are displayed in fully independent displays located in different places (one in the office and one at home, say), so it sometimes considers "frames in another display" as invisible, just like iconified frames (except they can't be deiconified). Stefan