From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: ignoring comments and/or strings (in source files) by _any_ search function? Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:34:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1182770308.035170.222710@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1182780746.677970.186320@c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183128070 8342 80.91.229.12 (29 Jun 2007 14:41:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:41:10 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 29 16:41:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I4Hel-0008Qh-ER for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:41:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I4Hek-0003kI-Bp for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:41:06 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.umontreal.ca!news.umontreal.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:34:21 -0500 Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NTQM2JK/llOOYTL+a9Kh9DLHl2Q= Original-Lines: 18 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.204.27.213 Original-X-Trace: sv3-Szh9o3R/mz38DA/DLTB5UIilwKF/PjmXCn+OUAjI+OjeoPByKbwkiEbPPZ3kV0aQc9A3eT9PudAves8!A57tLMzFOWa/zv0zHrAs9hgRvV/sS4FvM904dy+YxS5JDZq5lH8VCFSJmZXvYEIJrG2bpUkchxTZ!ORvT2ygoCEyEN4ACyQ== Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@umontreal.ca X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@umontreal.ca X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.35 Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:149761 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:45349 Archived-At: >> I could simply implement this as a function if I would know how to pass >> R to FUN? (I know only macro's `,@' -- is there an equivalent >> for functions?) > Meanwhile I realized I can use `apply' for this: (apply fun r) works > fine. That's the way to do it (either `apply' or `funcall' depending on the situation). > Is there another, "better" solution also? The only better way I can think of is to use another language where `funcall' can be dropped, but since you'll probably need `apply' instead, I can't think of any way it could be better, really. Stefan