From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: rainbow-delimiters-mode, syntax-begin-function and font-lock-beginning-of-syntax-function Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4455"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Help Gnu Emacs To: fatiparty@tutanota.com Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 25 15:18:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCMeP-0000xr-6B for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:18:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCMeN-0004BO-D2 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:18:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCLUg-0006uU-DX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:04:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:24900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCLUc-0002R0-8L for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:04:16 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 15B724410C8; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:04:12 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B9B5D44108A; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:04:10 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1643115850; bh=oBUbakOUqdA1dGCg1n9HYWSsnysrOfPPgSXto5R4fBc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=G3PR763vG6JTZAMX6+cNnxFJeN5YbUaskLTRjnbjlJu14f6ghX1bfDjsuePHcZLza 3AvF+APg8EyNg8edi5oz4yT4PACe6wVBziNu+crRo0A525309JJs+D1Gj6igRyzy4Y JWan20OAO2UL39QK3nf3eCi8d+cCVytyjNbXlVm+aqyJQM6iAEcd7lfxmYZ3QwefgS XfeCutuqg70RVOJRtYCq6zU5W4F0OceeUP/D/+moUNg1gEqcOt4G0WpF9XHBajXUB4 90DZdvcNIj6eN4ypoz1IxD0n7EiVp5OlwQHT7vV0WlBb3k/uCpWsmijQOvscUVtee2 TFaBfHmLlx9OQ== Original-Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6557F12046D; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:04:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (fatiparty@tutanota.com's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:46:35 +0100 (CET)") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:135521 Archived-At: fatiparty@tutanota.com [2022-01-25 09:46:35] wrote: > Jan 25, 2022, 11:18 by help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org: >>> Have looked for `font-lock-beginning-of-syntax-function' but >>> could not find information of possible obsolescence. >> % grep font-lock-beginning-of-syntax-function etc/NEWS* >> etc/NEWS.19:font-lock-beginning-of-syntax-function and font-lock-keywords-case-fold-search. >> etc/NEWS.25:Removed 'font-lock-beginning-of-syntax-function' and the SYNTAX-BEGIN >> % > 'syntax-begin-function' has also been declared obsolete. "Also" isn't quite right here: the above grep shows the other var has been *removed* which is different from being declared obsolete. > Would this mean that I can remove the following pieces It means those pieces of code only have an effect for packages that still use that obsolete variable. Whether you want to remove it or not is a choice I can't make for you. Stefan