From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is there a way to instrument for edebug a form (say, a progn) given to `eval'? Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:43:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k2nw866r.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wprv6e0f.fsf@web.de> <87mvslrn8q.fsf@mbork.pl> <87k2nos8g8.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451997859 1157 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2016 12:44:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 05 13:44:09 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aGQy9-0000bI-4t for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:44:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGQy8-0004yV-Bt for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGQxs-0004uf-DX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGQxp-0007HE-2V for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:43:52 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:54515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGQxo-0007Gt-Tn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:43:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u05ChgNc028294; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:43:43 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DBF25AE09F; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:43:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87k2nos8g8.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:04:55 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5541=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5541> : inlines <4176> : streams <1565822> : uri <2114570> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:108615 Archived-At: > Ha, that's interesting. Do I get it correctly that the "normal > backquote" is the symbol \`, That's right. > which is an alias for the `backquote' macro? Pretty much, yes, Stefan