* called-interactively-p and edebug
@ 2011-02-01 8:43 Le Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Le Wang @ 2011-02-01 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 264 bytes --]
Hi
When I step through this function:
(defun foo ()
(interactive)
(when (called-interactively-p 'any)
(message "Interactive!")
'foo-called-interactively))
(called-interactively-p 'any) is nil even when called interactively. Is
this a bug?
--
Le
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 437 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: called-interactively-p and edebug
[not found] <mailman.1.1296549798.22589.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
@ 2011-02-01 17:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-02-02 1:14 ` Le Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-02-01 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
> When I step through this function:
> (defun foo ()
> (interactive)
> (when (called-interactively-p 'any)
> (message "Interactive!")
> 'foo-called-interactively))
> (called-interactively-p 'any) is nil even when called interactively. Is
> this a bug?
Yes, it's a known bug: stepping through a function with Edebug is done
by rewriting the function, and called-interactively-p is a hackish
function that doesn't have a clean enough semantics to survive
this rewrite.
That's one of the reasons the docstring says:
This function is meant for implementing advice and other
function-modifying features. Instead of using this, it is sometimes
cleaner to give your function an extra optional argument whose
`interactive' spec specifies non-nil unconditionally ("p" is a good
way to do this), or via (not (or executing-kbd-macro noninteractive)).
So I'd recommend you use the interactive spec instead, as in:
(defun foo (am-i-interactive)
(interactive "p")
(when am-i-interactive
(message "Interactive!")
'foo-called-interactively))
-- Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: called-interactively-p and edebug
2011-02-01 17:00 ` called-interactively-p and edebug Stefan Monnier
@ 2011-02-02 1:14 ` Le Wang
2011-02-03 3:58 ` Le Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Le Wang @ 2011-02-02 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1406 bytes --]
Thanks Stefan, I discovered this in a defadvice, but reported it using the
simplest repro I could find. I'll keep your tip about preferring
interactive forms in mind.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>wrote:
> > When I step through this function:
>
> > (defun foo ()
> > (interactive)
> > (when (called-interactively-p 'any)
> > (message "Interactive!")
> > 'foo-called-interactively))
>
> > (called-interactively-p 'any) is nil even when called interactively. Is
> > this a bug?
>
> Yes, it's a known bug: stepping through a function with Edebug is done
> by rewriting the function, and called-interactively-p is a hackish
> function that doesn't have a clean enough semantics to survive
> this rewrite.
> That's one of the reasons the docstring says:
>
> This function is meant for implementing advice and other
> function-modifying features. Instead of using this, it is sometimes
> cleaner to give your function an extra optional argument whose
> `interactive' spec specifies non-nil unconditionally ("p" is a good
> way to do this), or via (not (or executing-kbd-macro noninteractive)).
>
> So I'd recommend you use the interactive spec instead, as in:
>
> (defun foo (am-i-interactive)
> (interactive "p")
> (when am-i-interactive
> (message "Interactive!")
> 'foo-called-interactively))
>
>
> -- Stefan
>
--
Le
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2003 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: called-interactively-p and edebug
2011-02-02 1:14 ` Le Wang
@ 2011-02-03 3:58 ` Le Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Le Wang @ 2011-02-03 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1793 bytes --]
I should add for posterity's sake that interactive forms do work in
defadvice:
(defun foo (beg end)
(interactive "r")
(message "%s %s" beg end))
(defadvice foo (around foo-adv activate)
(interactive
(list (point-min) (point-max)))
ad-do-it)
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Le Wang <l26wang@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Stefan, I discovered this in a defadvice, but reported it using the
> simplest repro I could find. I'll keep your tip about preferring
> interactive forms in mind.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>wrote:
>
>> > When I step through this function:
>>
>> > (defun foo ()
>> > (interactive)
>> > (when (called-interactively-p 'any)
>> > (message "Interactive!")
>> > 'foo-called-interactively))
>>
>> > (called-interactively-p 'any) is nil even when called interactively. Is
>> > this a bug?
>>
>> Yes, it's a known bug: stepping through a function with Edebug is done
>> by rewriting the function, and called-interactively-p is a hackish
>> function that doesn't have a clean enough semantics to survive
>> this rewrite.
>> That's one of the reasons the docstring says:
>>
>> This function is meant for implementing advice and other
>> function-modifying features. Instead of using this, it is sometimes
>> cleaner to give your function an extra optional argument whose
>> `interactive' spec specifies non-nil unconditionally ("p" is a good
>> way to do this), or via (not (or executing-kbd-macro noninteractive)).
>>
>> So I'd recommend you use the interactive spec instead, as in:
>>
>> (defun foo (am-i-interactive)
>> (interactive "p")
>> (when am-i-interactive
>> (message "Interactive!")
>> 'foo-called-interactively))
>>
>>
>> -- Stefan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Le
>
--
Le
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2793 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-03 3:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <mailman.1.1296549798.22589.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2011-02-01 17:00 ` called-interactively-p and edebug Stefan Monnier
2011-02-02 1:14 ` Le Wang
2011-02-03 3:58 ` Le Wang
2011-02-01 8:43 Le Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).