From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleksandr Gavenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Question about Elisp language abilities (evaluating expr on time of func definition and ability to construct function). Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:45:47 +0300 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317336386 24016 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2011 22:46:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:46:26 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 30 00:46:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PN0-0007fy-CZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:46:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59410 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PMz-0005ss-Od for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:46:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39598) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PMr-0005sZ-Kl for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PMq-0007lH-AO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PMq-0007kO-4x for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:46:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PMo-0007cE-VQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:46:10 +0200 Original-Received: from 214-8-202-46.pool.ukrtel.net ([46.202.8.214]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:46:10 +0200 Original-Received: from gavenkoa by 214-8-202-46.pool.ukrtel.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:46:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 214-8-202-46.pool.ukrtel.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:82377 Archived-At: 30.09.2011 1:14, Oleksandr Gavenko пишет: > 30.09.2011 0:33, Oleksandr Gavenko пишет: >> Is there any Elisp special form which evaluate args when 'defun' parsed >> (like words which defined with IMMEDIATE marker in Forth prog lang)? >> >> (defun f (x) >> (IMMEDIATE (message "hello!")) >> (1+ x) >> ) >> I have understood that difference between Elisp and Forth syntax (on evaluation)! In Forth word definition IMMEDIATE like word placed into definition: : abs dup <0 if neg then ; 'if' and 'then' such word. On other corner in Elisp you wrap whole definition with powerful macro construction: > (defmacro my-defun-rename-symb-tree (name doc func) > "Travel by TREE and applies FUNC to each symbol." > `(defun ,name (tree)