From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: What's your favourite *under_publicized* editing feature
	ofEmacs?
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 08:52:33 -0500
Organization: Ph'nglui mglw'nfah Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
Message-ID: <ikitn1$kv6$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <ae23d097-ee87-41b1-9bd9-f74c6cbbd1aa@l22g2000pre.googlegroups.com>	<ik1q3q$j4k$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<87ei6zpbor.fsf@rapttech.com.au>	<2p8vx4550z.fsf@shell.xmission.com>
	<ika571$o63$1@speranza.aioe.org>	<jwvr5au7dwv.fsf-monnier+gnu.emacs.help@gnu.org>	<ikcqgk$sgl$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<87lj11dhm9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>	<ikdqii$33d$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<87pqqda3a4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>	<ikdrtt$87c$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<slrniml2ei.mua.jcb@krk.inf.ed.ac.uk>	<ikedtp$ko1$1@news.eternal-september.org>	<ikee5o$ogf$5@speranza.aioe.org>
	<87d3md89mh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>	<ikehlf$34k$1@speranza.aioe.org>	<jwvsjv84y6q.fsf-monnier+gnu.emacs.help@gnu.org>	<87pqqclc38.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<ikgo37$9r6$4@speranza.aioe.org>	<87aahghqod.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<ikhd9h$ik$3@speranza.aioe.org> <87y64zgpgo.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298990506 23904 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2011 14:41:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:41:46 +0000 (UTC)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 01 15:41:42 2011
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1PuQl7-0000yu-7d
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:41:05 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48871 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1PuQl6-0007Bx-7z
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:41:04 -0500
Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news-transit.tcx.org.uk!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs
Original-Lines: 21
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 11btTy9dqAzpF76m3NmSCA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu comp.lang.lisp:300136 gnu.emacs.help:185476
	comp.emacs:101193
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:79628
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/79628>

On 01/03/2011 4:27 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Cthun<cthun_117@qmail.net.au>  writes:
>
>> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
>> with Lisp, Kastrup? It is well known that it is all-caps languages
>> like COBOL and BASIC that cause brain damage, Kastrup.
>
> Today's Common Lisp is just as case insensitive as those.

Except that it's not called "COMMON LISP", Kastrup.

> You are not particularly good at avoiding unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claims, are you?

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with Lisp, 
Kastrup.

> You don't even get the premises to your inane conclusions right.

What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do 
with Lisp, Kastrup?