From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Cthun Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: What's your favourite *under_publicized* editing feature ofEmacs? Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:52:52 -0500 Organization: Ph'nglui mglw'nfah Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn Message-ID: References: <1578157c-17a0-41ea-9420-9330f68b10fe@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <87ei6zpbor.fsf@rapttech.com.au> <2p8vx4550z.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <87lj11dhm9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87pqqda3a4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298839300 7930 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2011 20:41:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:41:40 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 27 21:41:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtnQB-0005xw-0o for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:41:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtnPs-0003LM-3g for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:40:32 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!newsserver.news.garr.it!kanaga.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: comp.emacs,gnu.emacs.help,comp.lang.lisp Original-Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy Original-Lines: 48 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: IbCz4rLuh3ENxhHLFVKMBw.user.speranza.aioe.org Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu comp.emacs:101158 gnu.emacs.help:185382 comp.lang.lisp:300012 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:79538 Archived-At: On 27/02/2011 12:28 PM, Julian Bradfield wrote: > On 2011-02-27, Cthun wrote: >> On 27/02/2011 10:46 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Last time I looked, revision control did not concern itself with builds >>> or library dependencies or bug reports or feature requests. >> >> Sure it does. > > You're confusing X with X What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, combined with a classic contradiction, have to do with Lisp, Bradfield? >>> Uh, you already forgot what I wrote about the various versions of >>> articles >> >> No, it's simply not relevant. Articles are typically written, revised, >> and eventually *finished*. > > Have you ever actually written an academic article? What does your question have to do with Lisp, Bradfield? >> Articles are not typically published with "bugs" and then later >> republished without them. Typical articles are published once and then >> that's it. > > You're not an academic, are you? What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with Lisp, Bradfield? >>> Gross. You are not confusing word processing on a computer with >>> handwritten manuscripts by chance? > > As David says, gross. What is "strikethru" anyway? You're not a writer, are you, Bradfield? >> Of course not. You on the other hand seem to be confusing word >> processing with software development! > > Only those who don't know any better use word processors What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with Lisp, Bradfield? One wonders what you think word processors are for and what explanation you'd proffer for the fact that they are one of the more lucrative categories of software out there, Bradfield.