Re: defalias inside a defun

[Heime <heimeborgia@protonmail.com>]

On Tuesday, April 9th, 2024 at 9:43 PM, Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 06 2024, Heime wrote:
> 
> > Would it be acceptable to call a defalias inside a defun ?\
> 
> 
> "Acceptable" how? Stylistically? Technically?

Technically.  I want to make available some aliases dependent upon certain
modes. 

(defun gali-exigens (seltr)
  "Load requirements based upon specific major modes and define
`gali' commands to access `avus' functionalities using
alternative names via aliases."

  (pcase seltr
    ;;------------------------------------------------------------
    ("Bash"
       (require 'avus-bash)
       (defalias 'gali-bash-zilindr #'avus-bash-zilindr
         "Insert bash constructs."))
    ;;------------------------------------------------------------
    ("Latex"
       (require 'avus-latex)
       (defalias 'gali-latex-zilindr #'avus-latex-zilindr
         "Insert latex constructs.")
       (defalias 'gali-latex-vjero #'avus-latex-vjero
         "Insert latex probability constructs.")
       (defalias 'gali-latex-ams #'avus-latex-ams
         "Insert latex ams constructs.")
       (defalias 'gali-latex-stix #'avus-latex-stix
         "Insert latex stix constructs.")) )

 
> Technically, I don't think it matters whether defalias occurs at the top level
> or inside a defun.
> 
> Stylistically, I don't really see anything wrong with it, but there's no
> accounting for taste. :-)
> 
> --
> Joost Kremers
> Life has its moments