From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>,
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: RE: Defining functions within functions?
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:56:26 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f85e0bb9-1ba1-4245-b1e9-ee64db958dbc@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874m9n6t3o.fsf@mbork.pl>
> And I wanted to use the former variant, but it struck me as not very
> elegant. As for the latter, I'm not sure I understand it exactly, but
> I'll give it some thought.
>
> For now, I decided to go with lambdas, but also to sprinkle the code
> with comments. Old-fashioned, but should do the jon in my case.
A suggestion: Post a concrete example of what you need, and
see what concrete suggestions you get.
Typically, this stuff is not complicated. The first thing
to do, IMO, is to determine whether you really need/want to
do something special/complicated. Why do you think you want
a nested defun or other form of local function definition?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-24 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-23 5:13 Defining functions within functions? Marcin Borkowski
2016-05-23 5:34 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2016-05-24 21:28 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-05-23 20:09 ` Michael Heerdegen
2016-05-24 21:31 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-05-24 21:56 ` Drew Adams [this message]
2016-05-24 22:10 ` Carlos Konstanski
2016-05-25 6:21 ` Marcin Borkowski
[not found] ` <mailman.224.1464127813.1216.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2016-05-24 22:21 ` Emanuel Berg
2016-05-25 6:20 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-05-25 8:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-05-25 8:43 ` Nicolas Petton
2016-05-25 19:30 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-05-25 9:07 ` tomas
2016-05-25 15:41 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-05-25 14:18 ` Drew Adams
2016-05-25 15:39 ` Marcin Borkowski
[not found] ` <mailman.255.1464190813.1216.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2016-05-26 7:52 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <mailman.223.1464127012.1216.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2016-05-24 22:17 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <mailman.222.1464125502.1216.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2016-05-24 21:46 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <mailman.141.1464034180.1216.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2016-05-24 7:13 ` Emanuel Berg
2016-05-24 14:33 ` Barry Margolin
2016-05-24 15:43 ` Emanuel Berg
2016-05-24 16:15 ` Barry Margolin
2016-05-24 21:36 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] <mailman.94.1463980455.1216.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2016-05-23 7:47 ` Emanuel Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f85e0bb9-1ba1-4245-b1e9-ee64db958dbc@default \
--to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=mbork@mbork.pl \
--cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).