unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Cc: Jonathan Groll <lists@groll.co.za>,
	GnuEmacs Help <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Byte-compiled elisp libraries on different platforms
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:42:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7ccd24b0811201042j31e6240ice71413f35bfd119@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000f01c94b3d$f324c010$c2b22382@us.oracle.com>

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 19:29, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:

> Most, yes, probably. The byte-compiler changes probably affect only a minority
> of code in incompatible ways. But it's enough. ;-)

Hmm. I could be wrong, but I don't remember any changes in the 23.X
byte compiler / interpreter stuff making old (22.X, not 19.X ;-)
byte-code incompatible.
Any such fails is more likely to be from the lisp code than the byte-code.

(Of course 23.X files use a different coding system, so they are not
back-compatible.)

> Agreed. But if the uncompiled code works on two different platforms, then so
> should the byte-compiled code (compiled with the same release #).

"Should" does not imply "must", of course. You can use compile-time
tricks to do almost anything, including generating code which bears no
relation to the original lisp...

             Juanma




  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-20 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-20 10:47 Byte-compiled elisp libraries on different platforms Jonathan Groll
2008-11-20 11:02 ` Juanma Barranquero
2008-11-20 17:19   ` Drew Adams
2008-11-20 18:08     ` Juanma Barranquero
2008-11-20 18:29       ` Drew Adams
2008-11-20 18:42         ` Juanma Barranquero [this message]
2008-11-20 18:56           ` Drew Adams
2008-11-20 11:02 ` Peter Dyballa
2008-11-22  5:25 ` Xavier Maillard
     [not found] <mailman.823.1227178080.26697.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2008-11-20 10:55 ` Nordlöw
2008-11-21  4:27 ` Tim X

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7ccd24b0811201042j31e6240ice71413f35bfd119@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lekktu@gmail.com \
    --cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    --cc=lists@groll.co.za \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).