From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Maciej Katafiasz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Elisp Tutorial dumb question -- but I thought I better doublecheck ?? Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1177431781.3373.8.camel@CASE> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177489307 9869 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2007 08:21:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:21:47 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 25 10:21:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hgcky-0001k9-7R for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:21:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgcqZ-0003gX-48 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgcq5-0003aG-BZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:27:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgcq2-0003Yx-Pl for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:27:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgcq2-0003Yj-Ec for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:26:58 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgckP-0000kG-JO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HgckJ-00009N-Gb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:21:03 +0200 Original-Received: from users.kollegienet.dk ([130.226.173.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:21:03 +0200 Original-Received: from mathrick by users.kollegienet.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:21:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: users.kollegienet.dk User-Agent: pan 0.120 (Plate of Shrimp) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43156 Archived-At: Den Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:23:01 -0400 skrev William Case: > The differences seem trivial, but can I re-write the lambda algorithm in > terms of the defun algorithm for myself such that: Not sure what you mean, but defun is simply defined in terms of lambda. (defun foo (arg) "doc" body) is the same as (fset 'foo (lambda (arg) "doc" body))