From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: egarrulo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Why does Emacs lack `backward-delete-word`? Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:20:27 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457263526 1679 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2016 11:25:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 11:25:26 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 06 12:25:25 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1acWoO-000800-Pj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 12:25:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acWoK-0005sX-5e for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 06:25:20 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Trace: individual.net vtyHvzSKoeDcE2EYwGXL6gO5l+LiK/ibn88MvUwMcy/x7El7hY Cancel-Lock: sha1:I9A2ulMEAR+IFc9NsMryyXFoVfU= X-Mozilla-News-Host: snews://News.Individual.NET:563 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:217168 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:109461 Archived-At: I know how to define `backward-delete-word`, but if such a basic command were deemed useful by power users, it would ship with Emacs by now. Do Emacs power users prefer to fix a typo by deleting one char at a time? Or is it because they don't mind polluting the kill ring with typos? Anything else? Thanks.