From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Question about customising faces Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 18:48:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <871qszs2ku.fsf@fastmail.fm> <83wnarw61n.fsf@gnu.org> <878rn6u7gs.fsf@fastmail.fm> <83y1v6v4x0.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmgip69s.fsf@fastmail.fm> <83r10xu0xp.fsf@gnu.org> <83fshdtx02.fsf@gnu.org> <83edwxtwbj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38039"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 30 21:37:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oT72v-0009iY-EH for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:37:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59154 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oT72s-0001ai-MK for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oT6I9-0000IO-Dj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:48:53 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:45898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oT6I7-0006DB-Qz; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:48:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1661885327; bh=yz1ufHsidXoLZjUJVSp8AH8wVJl5OF7s2gWOcQ6zjps=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=30bsfKOgYkRTX+i3alEPgN0+H+SzIu9hp60PZDWxIMNAO7Ht0FbuGd7MC+eIJFXrO I94EmYDPV0YFspMvv/SYQI19FMiqShvaec3kE9B5r3e3/8E2V77lVNFfAhpkuV49cG jIF2/yLNX88kpSRJZmqwc3BffEAnTJGLccdjpXiX3Zv3Y5YRwvnP+8LYHoxclgwJGw R+Px1wTdTehj43Td5GoGSD1vDg231/3Dj3OSncXP+PwgmGCA7PAlzx2qHnTo837K+C ro40pdKAuHIqZ6ueSxxPj3+ihMEEoc7Z/ep+mxpPTVbqoSO1b10IpacuhES4pJLzBM zKnwYu2qg3eIg== In-Reply-To: <83edwxtwbj.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:139180 Archived-At: >> emacs -Q >> C-x 5 2 >> M-: (set-face-attribute 'isearch nil :background 'unspecified :foregroun= d "#d33682") RET >> C-s buffer >> C-x 5 2 >> C-s buffer >> >> I see exactly the exact same colors with the two isearch commands. > > Joost used nil, not 'unspecified, for the background attribute. > Which is why I asked why he did not use 'unspecified instead of nil =F0=9F= =98=89 What does nil do that 'unspecified doesn't? (And after using nil, describe-face displays 'unspecified.)