From: Rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 21:10:42 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4d71a02-c013-4544-a1dc-4190d496c38d@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2501.1401420691.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
On Friday, May 30, 2014 9:01:18 AM UTC+5:30, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Allan Streib wrote:
> > Emanuel Berg writes:
> > > For the Unix world, I have read there was once an
> > > editor called ed that didn't showed the file being
> > > manipulated at all - the "state" of the file, as it was
> > > called (unbelievable).
> Once was and still is too. The GNU ed is available.
> http://www.gnu.org/software/ed/
> > Teletypes and other brands of paper-based "terminals" were commonplace
> > then. You didn't need (nor was it practical) for the editor to display
> > the contents of the file, when it was already printed on the paper in
> > front of you. So you used sed-like search/replace commands.
> When I was at university I wrote thousands of lines of code using qed
> (a precurser to ed on the old Honeywell GCOS system) and paper
> terminals over acoustic coupled modems. If nothing else it will teach
> you how to use regular expressions at a very deep level! Editors like
> ed are actually very efficient if you know how to use them.
> > Even the first CRTs were dumb (aka "glass teletypes") and didn't have
> > addressable cursors. You cloud clear and redraw the screen maybe, which
> > was painful at 110 or 300 baud.
> Agreed. Very painful. From first hand experience.
> Here is a funny modern day ed story.
:
:
> I still prefer emacs however.
Yeah I had a friend who staunchly believed that using ed
would clarify the thoughts and purify the soul.
I sometimes get the feel that we emacs users look like analogous cartoons to
the current generation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1964.1400890902.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-24 0:53 ` RTF for emacs Emanuel Berg
2014-05-25 19:24 ` Robert Thorpe
2014-05-25 20:38 ` James Freer
2014-05-26 1:15 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-05-26 1:49 ` Robert Thorpe
2014-05-26 3:41 ` Stefan Monnier
[not found] ` <mailman.2103.1401075744.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-26 12:39 ` Rusi
2014-05-26 14:15 ` Rusi
2014-05-26 23:29 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <mailman.2101.1401068969.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-26 2:41 ` Rusi
2014-05-26 23:28 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <mailman.2081.1401050318.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-29 0:55 ` Emanuel Berg
2014-05-29 1:38 ` editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs) Emanuel Berg
2014-05-29 1:41 ` Emanuel Berg
2014-05-29 7:23 ` editor and word processor history Glyn Millington
2014-05-29 9:39 ` editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs) James Freer
2014-05-29 13:14 ` Allan Streib
2014-05-29 21:40 ` Robert Thorpe
2014-05-30 3:31 ` Bob Proulx
[not found] ` <mailman.2501.1401420691.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-30 4:10 ` Rusi [this message]
2014-05-31 23:03 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <mailman.2380.1401356412.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-29 12:32 ` editor and word processor history Haines Brown
2014-05-29 22:58 ` editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs) Emanuel Berg
2014-05-30 5:52 ` James Freer
[not found] ` <mailman.2505.1401429187.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-30 10:37 ` Emanuel Berg
2014-05-30 19:12 ` James Freer
[not found] ` <mailman.2563.1401477129.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-31 12:44 ` From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history Emanuel Berg
2014-05-31 17:23 ` Barry Margolin
2014-05-31 19:26 ` Emanuel Berg
2014-05-31 23:17 ` Sharon Kimble
[not found] ` <mailman.2663.1401578257.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-31 23:54 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <mailman.2390.1401369425.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-29 23:38 ` editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs) Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <mailman.2376.1401348837.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-29 23:51 ` editor and word processor history Emanuel Berg
2014-05-29 5:17 ` RTF for emacs Rusi
2014-05-29 22:49 ` Emanuel Berg
2014-05-29 9:28 ` James Freer
[not found] <mailman.2479.1401399676.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-29 22:57 ` editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs) Emanuel Berg
2014-05-29 23:49 ` Barry Margolin
2014-05-30 1:52 ` Robert Thorpe
[not found] <mailman.2496.1401414782.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-05-30 2:20 ` Emanuel Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4d71a02-c013-4544-a1dc-4190d496c38d@googlegroups.com \
--to=rustompmody@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).