Re: Efficient Emacs usage?

[FCC <fcc509@netscape.net>]

Floyd L. Davidson articulated on 11/22/2004 7:47 PM:

>
>>(sorry, gnus does not count for me, although I am very much
>>aware of its popularity among Emacs users, because probably it would be
>>more efficient for me if I did not have to check or send e-mails and
>>also spend less time on the internet).
>>    
>>
>
>I do not understand what you are saying there.  What it appears
>to say doesn't make sense.  To put it mildly, Gnus is the most
>efficient and effective Usenet *and* email user agent available.
>
>If you currently deal with more than say a couple hundred emails
>a day, moving to Gnus from just about anything else will result
>in a significant time savings.  On the other hand, even if you
>don't deal with that many emails...  use Gnus and you can then
>go out and subscribe dozens of mailing lists, even if some of
>them are of marginal value, just because it can be done
>*without* putting you into an email bind that wastes your time.
>
>  
>
I wanted to draw attention to the fact that most internet activity,
including processing of e-mails with their ever-increasing number is a
time sink, since I was talking about the efficiency.

-- 
FCC.

===

Of course I don't look busy... I did it right the first time.

-Anonymous