From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ilya Zakharevich Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what? Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department. Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036025514 30046 80.91.224.249 (31 Oct 2002 00:51:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Bcc: ilya Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1873Yu-0007oM-00 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:51:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1873Yv-0003Ue-00; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:51:53 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!enews.sgi.com!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!agate.berkeley.edu!agate!ilya Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 29 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: powdermilk.math.berkeley.edu Original-X-Trace: agate.berkeley.edu 1036025320 27112 169.229.140.13 (31 Oct 2002 00:48:40 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:48:40 +0000 (UTC) X-How-To-Reach-Me: The From: address is valid X-How-To-Disable-Cc: Put in the headers the line: Mail-Copies-To: never Originator: ilya@powdermilk Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:106597 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:3147 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:3147 I wrote in article : > > SPECIFICS of the problem1: when asked to show cyrillic, it shows > > cyrillic indeed. However, the shown glyphs have no relationship to > > the actual Cyrillic text (e.g., in the Hello, World example). Do not > > have a slightest idea how to report it in more details... > > It looks like pointing-fingers was not dead-on-the-target; while Emacs > is faulty, the principal blame should go to xrus-1251 and (allegedly) > Netscape. An excerpt from > > http://www.siber.org/sib/russify/x-windows/#win-fonts After some private email exchange with the knowledgeable people (designers of the system?), I got the following fix: (setq face-ignored-fonts '("-cronyx-.*-iso8859-5$")) It is not documented, but this REx is matched against the name Emacs uses for the query, and not the "actual" font name; moreover, this REx is case-insensitive, and is not achored. E.g., in my case Emacs was getting a Cronyx font via an -iso8859-5 alias; the actual encoding of the font (and the tail of the "actual" name) was reported to be RAWIN-R. But the REx should be designed to exclude the alias name, not the actual name. Hope this helps, Ilya