From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jude DaShiell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does Richard M. Stallman still scrutinize and develop the codes of Emacs now? Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 20:53:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83sfzb9nx8.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnon9hvm.fsf@iki.fi> <87im06ri56.fsf@zoho.eu> <86sfz2e9mo.fsf@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16503"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Wayne Harris , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 22 02:53:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mHbk8-00042j-HM for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 02:53:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59086 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHbk7-0000t8-A3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 20:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHbjm-0000sv-NQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 20:53:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailbackend.panix.com ([166.84.1.89]:34874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHbjl-0000Vr-9d for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 20:53:22 -0400 Original-Received: from panix1.panix.com (panix1.panix.com [166.84.1.1]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GscLS2qnkz2mJZ; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 20:53:20 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=panix.com; s=panix; t=1629593600; bh=BoShHKdwYDsfRPWT2uBKV4tDfI9O4qLzNr9+wiGSEqk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=s7FMkbr4tBDSo2N5nzAnwPiIYR47NPY2GzpjogXWxKC8g5NGhNA7p58qsvbyRnPQ/ 9kPuplH/Grp5/v/cPgphbFhXL1yylAtygf88Q7nZGft8r3uLf9QPsooYchKp60s5e/ p5iPPcyesZTHPGynp4PY8smydSwml7U2ashq0byU= Original-Received: by panix1.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20712) id 4GscLM1DwBzcbc; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 20:53:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panix1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GscLM0nmhzcbP; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 20:53:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <86sfz2e9mo.fsf@protonmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=166.84.1.89; envelope-from=jdashiel@panix.com; helo=mailbackend.panix.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:132673 Archived-At: Last I read on an article comparing emacs and vim, Stephen Monier had the emacs lead passed to him by Richard Stallman and the fact that emacs has a line of succession made it different from vim in that vim had no clear line of succession. At that time the lead developer of vim hadn't designated anyone to take over development when the original lead developer of vim could no longer continue developing for whatever reason. On Sat, 21 Aug 2021, Wayne Harris via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor wrote: > Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor > writes: > > [...] > > > (Quote from memory, it is from some of the Linux > > documentaries, "Revolution OS" is the one that comes to > > mind...) > > Really cool movie. Thanks for reminding me of it. > > >