From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jude DaShiell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: emacs 26.3 control-k misbehavior Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:44:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3eed7cb1-982a-4047-b838-ba784230fe32@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="140426"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: Drew Adams , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 22 00:44:55 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iioQZ-000aOu-AQ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 00:44:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43030 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iioQY-0001Za-4F for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:44:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39610) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iioQN-0001ZU-FU for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:44:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iioQM-0002VB-8Z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:44:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailbackend.panix.com ([166.84.1.89]:59948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iioQM-0002Ji-2l for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: from panix1.panix.com (panix1.panix.com [166.84.1.1]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47gMfJ0733zlZ8; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:44:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by panix1.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20712) id 47gMfH5mXmzcbc; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:44:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panix1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47gMfH5JGCzcbW; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:44:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <3eed7cb1-982a-4047-b838-ba784230fe32@default> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux (Android) [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 166.84.1.89 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:122079 Archived-At: c-h k c-k told me lots. Apparently kill-whole-line was non-nil. I fixed that now so shouldn't have this happen again unexpectedly. Thanks. On Sat, 21 Dec 2019, Drew Adams wrote: > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:18:33 > From: Drew Adams > To: Jude DaShiell , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > Subject: RE: emacs 26.3 control-k misbehavior > > > control-k as near as I can tell deletes an entire line and not > > everything to the right of point. > > No, not by default it doesn't. > > > I was doing editing with it and wondering why it was messing up so > > badly and now I know. > > What is your value of variable `kill-whole-line'? > > What does `C-h k `C-k' tell you? > > --