From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kevin@blinky.its.caltech.edu (Kevin A. Scaldeferri) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Editing email replies Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031008476 5728 127.0.0.1 (2 Sep 2002 23:14:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17m0Ow-0001UH-00 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 01:14:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17m0QP-0001Bh-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:16:05 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!nntp.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!blinky.its.caltech.edu!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh,gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 25 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: blinky.its.caltech.edu Original-X-Trace: naig.caltech.edu 1031008024 26620 131.215.48.132 (2 Sep 2002 23:07:04 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@caltech.edu Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-Xref: nntp.stanford.edu comp.mail.mh:9842 gnu.emacs.help:104410 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:976 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:976 In article , Peter Davis wrote: > >Well, I know I'm probably in a minority here, but I actually think >HTML e-mail is a pretty good idea. You can get much more readable, >and more *meaningful* content with HTML. Typographic conventions of >using boldface, italics, etc. evolved for a reason ... they improve >the readability and informativeness of text. I hardly ever see people use HTML in their email for these purposes. Usually they use it to make their text medium gray over a blue sky background image, or some similar nonsense. (That's actually a relatively tasteful, if pointless example. I've also seen some incredible attrocious uses of a half dozen colors of text and such.) Then there are the mail programs which think that every line should be wrapped in DIV tags so that it looks exactly like the author saw it... as long as you are using the same mail program as the author. -- ====================================================================== Kevin Scaldeferri Calif. Institute of Technology The INTJ's Prayer: Lord keep me open to others' ideas, WRONG though they may be.