From: Raffaele Ricciardi <rfflrccrd@gmail.com>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: thing-at-point: inconsistent behaviour?
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:00:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a929u0F61sU1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <barmar-091661.14343615082012@news.eternal-september.org>
On 08/15/2012 07:34 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article <a926tjFeslU1@mid.individual.net>,
> Raffaele Ricciardi <rfflrccrd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> the documentation of `thing-at-point' states that such function
returns "the
>> thing around or next to point". This is not the case with either
>> (thing-at-point
>> 'symbol) or (thing-at-point 'sexp), for they both may return the thing
>> before
>> point. Try it with the following snippet (! symbolizes the point):
>
> Doesn't "next to" include both immediately before and immediately after?
I stand corrected after having consulted a dictionary. Then it is
(thing-at-point 'list) that is misbehaving.
>
>>
>> A!
>> (A)!
>>
>> On the contrary, (bounds-of-thing-at-point 'list) returns nil as
>> expected in this
>> snippet:
>>
>> (A)!
>>
>> Is this inconsistent behaviour or am I missing something?
>>
>> Tested on GNU Emacs 24.1 started with "emacs -Q".
>>
>> Thank you.
>
> I think this is a problem with the thing-at-point handler for 'list.
> It's doing some weird stuff, that I think is intended to distinguide
> lists from sexps.
Aren't lists sexps as well?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-15 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-15 18:08 thing-at-point: inconsistent behaviour? Raffaele Ricciardi
2012-08-15 18:34 ` Barry Margolin
2012-08-15 18:44 ` Drew Adams
2012-08-15 19:00 ` Raffaele Ricciardi [this message]
2012-08-16 11:52 ` Andreas Röhler
[not found] ` <mailman.7107.1345117968.855.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2012-08-16 15:48 ` Barry Margolin
2012-08-16 16:24 ` Andreas Röhler
[not found] ` <mailman.7114.1345134264.855.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2012-08-16 17:12 ` Raffaele Ricciardi
2012-08-16 23:19 ` Barry Margolin
2012-08-17 0:46 ` Drew Adams
[not found] ` <mailman.7128.1345164390.855.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2012-08-17 1:46 ` Barry Margolin
2012-08-17 4:38 ` Drew Adams
[not found] ` <mailman.7135.1345178331.855.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2012-08-17 9:23 ` Raffaele Ricciardi
2012-08-20 0:15 ` Drew Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a929u0F61sU1@mid.individual.net \
--to=rfflrccrd@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).