Re: Any package for boolean search?

[Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>]

* Joel Reicher <joel.reicher@gmail.com> [2024-12-28 19:08]:
> Solving a search query is an eval, but I think you are saying you want to
> avoid code injection which is fair enough.

Search query is just a string I receive so parsing the string for OR
will be my first development.

> Off the top of my head you can map over the sexpr returned by read and
> rewrite the symbols to ones you control before evaling.

I understand that approach, and I understand there would be way to
allow only some symbols, though I assure you that reading the sexp is
not needed. Generally I do a lot of evals in my documents. I find the
feature fantastic. I am using it for template interpolation.

RCD Template Interpolation System for Emacs:
https://hyperscope.link/3/7/1/3/3/RCD-Template-Interpolation-System-for-Emacs.html

Though for website search it will be string parsing on chunks of
different types of queries.

> In my opinion it is still worth avoiding a parse, which is what Lisp can
> give you.

1. First stage of development

   - treat it as exact, collect IDs
   - allow 1-2 Levenshtein difference, 
      -- Function: string-distance string1 string2 &optional bytecompare
     This function returns the “Levenshtein distance” between the source
     string STRING1 and the target string STRING2.  The Levenshtein

   - get 5-10 pages where both or more words of the query, which are
     not stop words, appear apart from each other, unless user quoted
     the query

2. Second stage

   - recognize if there is any OR

-- 
Jean Louis