From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ndame Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: backward-sexp throws scan-error "Unbalanced parentheses", but forward-sexp works Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 04:47:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7P2hvHIAuBtvvAp5Gg8L9eq2f8SRRltOKMqGLvfvTOjSjgxKT3tp93lKU0v1WHJfzDudElnNlUyQDuvjo6L_JLtWEVsb1FuiclveZp_i9T0=@protonmail.com> Reply-To: ndame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23836"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 20 05:48:43 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAPNL-00061q-0W for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 05:48:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57470 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAPNJ-0007Db-76 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 23:48:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAPM4-0007DD-9x for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 23:47:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-40138.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.138]:58983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAPM1-0008Bi-TM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 23:47:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail2; t=1642654033; bh=ej+J1yjtEjAtXmFuV0hlrDhgCm+0nlj9k+Wd38jtsu4=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: From:To:Cc; b=QohH+DM9RF5IXAoLLjawVsfBFbXgHfyZ3SwbLae5mWDGCL/lNxdZo7PR1igO4socp RStehXU8TDxRUijtDL98FNbv5qyldBZzFGRuctHH4REKuQ0EoMyX0QzJWCR+i28L0f Cwh7odwqgcLPWzur6RTDqoDHkD4K/Q3pW1ajSM6Y3br1VznmmnkGCj581qcffU59eU BR9sIu0aDC9ne6+Tlj1vBS1nI+rjrM798ExwxE6nbY3SMc1Qrgxm4FrkW2OfyK1OKf FUcQEgWfRJd4OAU7x6Cj6aWuPS55r1kusBLBML9uP8comOoUJefTdt2jr7elEIA8/v XzikxVLBJyEcw== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.138; envelope-from=laszlomail@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40138.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:135459 Archived-At: >> So the problem went away, because I upgraded to the latest version, >> which is good, but I'm still wondering how the syntax parser got >> confused because of indentation stuff. > > Good question. Do you think it's possible that particular version of aggressive-indent-mod= e exposed a latent bug in emacs' syntax handler? Should I open a bug for emacs describing how the issue can be replicated using that older aggressive-indent-mode version?