From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hugo Wolf Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs 21.3.50 on OS X 10.2.2 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:08:40 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <33a4f8d2.0211122251.1c92698@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037186735 20530 80.91.224.249 (13 Nov 2002 11:25:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18BveH-0005Kz-00 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:25:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18Bvb2-0002XK-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 06:22:12 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc03.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Darwin) Original-Lines: 22 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.31.41.137 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com Original-X-Trace: sccrnsc03 1037185720 66.31.41.137 (Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:08:40 GMT) Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:08:40 GMT Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:106993 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:3547 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:3547 In article <33a4f8d2.0211122251.1c92698@posting.google.com>, Amos wrote: >> The sources you get with cvs date spec '-D "2002-11-01"' can >> definitely be built in 10.2.2. I did it this morning. > > Not for me. What do you have installed via fink. Currently I'm > not using fink at all. I wonder if that might somehow be the > difference.... Could be. My texinfo installation was made with fink. I have lots of other fink packages installed as well (~ 100 of them), but the emacs build process should never see any of it. I can post a complete list f you think it would help you debug this problem. > Man, never realized just how dependent I was to emacs until > today. :-( Nothing seems the same without it. Pretty sad. If you run XDarwin, the X11 emacs and xemacs clients are quite nice. But you may need fink to build them ....