From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Kill all proportional fonts! Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:13:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87tuethpw3.fsf@yandex.com> <87wnjp95v2.fsf@gmail.com> <87bl11422p.fsf@yandex.com> <87zgolw448.fsf@yahoo.com> <87v8z9vzls.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="16CeOvB7tfMFEhSx" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34614"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 11:14:30 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n29Uz-0008mC-IS for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:14:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57520 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n29Ux-0000P1-U9 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:14:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n29UM-0000Ot-S8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:13:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:35928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n29UL-0005FD-F2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:13:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4I9aJBNx+MBTk24y5i9U5RBGil4JviV8R+tv/Juuyo0=; b=qkLcTEzsejhNKDdU/rqyTx2wpd CKNpYNmdiC2apjPrZH14JeqXe9I1P0yASJmiQDU7UrZZ1PxIWMfdKR2Fb7DuTWP6mTF5GOyavszpw ale3tGzLct4+Nq7MDBn8se/yjPJh2DjSHcmB+Qb0gYvLdGlaehT4H9+J0MKlHiVADpjEct014F6xh fgeqxxgnQCfOnQPLPLCFGzQDovZ12vdSA5ZjV0K5rTOIuIQeKM3Wvx8bMVM4iCSl+nRTxOUGbH8qw 9tKG8moTTh2C+jUub7fJpnXskUBdsuEPSwoZZ5Rzr7ry/bFVgBxw2lgfj8WTEzo88NgLMfRycfRqK R0jX8Dag==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1n29UI-0005tT-Q3; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:13:46 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v8z9vzls.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:135049 Archived-At: --16CeOvB7tfMFEhSx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 05:38:07PM +0800, Po Lu wrote: > tomas@tuxteam.de writes: >=20 > > We are in violent agreement there. That makes it so complicated: > > Someone is going to object to every change. >=20 > Not true: :-) > for example, I don't see anyone objecting to the fix for > bug#52809 that was checked in this morning, even though it changes some > previously established behaviour of the Lucid toolkit. OK, OK, let's agree on "most changes". Or at least "a sizeable proportion of them". Cheers --=20 t --16CeOvB7tfMFEhSx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYcrjWgAKCRAFyCz1etHa RqqUAJwPphrZ3+OtAcTyp4XTVENYqA6H2QCfVkWK/gNgiQlzgShjyZ33P+mmBEg= =ycyS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --16CeOvB7tfMFEhSx--