From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does Richard M. Stallman still scrutinize and develop the codes of Emacs now? Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:04:34 +0300 Message-ID: References: <83sfzb9nx8.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnon9hvm.fsf@iki.fi> <87im06ri56.fsf@zoho.eu> <86sfz2e9mo.fsf@protonmail.com> <52bf3ee4-8e37-47ef-a28e-da8efc62f9a0@www.fastmail.com> <87fsv0rppy.fsf@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19244"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.7+183 (3d24855) (2021-05-28) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Tim Johnson Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 11:07:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIosL-0004ny-1a for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:07:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54952 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIosK-0004Mb-1z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:07:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIos1-0004ME-5K for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:06:53 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:41627) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIorz-0002zX-7k for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:06:52 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:102.87.158.23]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 0000000000069CBD.0000000061260805.00007815; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 02:06:12 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Tim Johnson , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:132714 Archived-At: * Tim Johnson [2021-08-24 00:05]: > Good grief, I never heard of neovim until just now. Have used vim > for ages, especially for adhoc system editing and have evil on emacs. > > As much as I've always admired vim, I've been a little concerned > that it appears to be a one-developer system. Glad to see that emacs > has moved away from that. As Vim is extensible similarly as Emacs everybody can contribute to it by providing extensions. If software is useful, I don't see any problem if it would be developed by single person. That is how majority of projects starts. As it is free software you are free to fork and build upon it if there is no possibility where you could, instead of forking it yourself, contribute collaboratively. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/