From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Who use C-x u or C-/ for undo? Who uses C-z for undo? Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:52:40 +0300 Message-ID: References: <871rdk4c1m.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> <640551af-d035-f133-3b98-fe7c7a06279d@yandex.ru> <8f760064-b6c2-5714-8a0c-6645b398e0fc@yandex.ru> <87czx2jh9y.fsf@zoho.eu> <87k0r9us9b.fsf@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33312"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 07:53:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lBuEh-0008ab-Ie for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 07:53:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48726 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBuEg-0005Zs-Jn for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 01:53:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBuEG-0005Zj-MQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 01:53:00 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:33503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBuEE-0001zd-Ur for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 01:53:00 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:197.157.34.167]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 0000000000011F80.00000000602B6BC8.00000A64; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 23:52:55 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k0r9us9b.fsf@zoho.eu> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:128108 Archived-At: * Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor [2021-02-15 21:00]: > Jean Louis wrote: > > > Also take in consideration that Xerox is US company and they > > used QWERTY, as US company did not think of > > international planning. > > Despite this overlook on behalf of the US companies, they > nonetheless seem to have had a certain degree of international > success, even in the field of computers. Alright, sure, but my statement was specific to Xerox and in relation to the reference from Wikipedia. Not that I invented the statement or conclusion.