From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [External] : Re: How to make M-x TAB not work on (interactive) declaration? Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:05:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87y1q0h0pp.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87cz7azqs7.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Xmx08PVvFJCXRsWe" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16892"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 21 15:05:47 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pJEV8-0004C8-CZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:05:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJEUg-0005JW-5n; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 09:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJEUd-0005JI-Ks for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 09:05:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJEUa-0008BV-UW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 09:05:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fxm7Ihc6VHy7eCfUk3GL0a41L5LGKZ1MUwfiwkTyU6w=; b=HusLfiXylBW4bjLwrC7be9jQjA brnhxwlwxiOCq63I0H4SnCy9lINCI9oI5R4oMLCZV0ikACFvnirZ6jYjM7SofXg22jBaKvczL9j6r epvMUQ8mTowK2CNNvAmCU5lpmDGqEUZJZABzo2iUeNheLb9QH77rSRbd/RzpmaoeprZSB43/cqXPB D1n3GLjb4GI2BxleiwMQxEQ5maJPsEu4VZagSD0qiBWAzWS1Cr8Npy+5W2L0F7LMT5+Ri4byLMSIH Fl2Nbvkj3gV9xrDf6+JHTsv/KnjtBwHZzxI9ld+47Ep0v5GlumFhqZgc4ju9wdovwl2U29Pv5kBgb LyAd4e0g==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pJEUX-00027i-8Q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:05:09 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87cz7azqs7.fsf@dataswamp.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142470 Archived-At: --Xmx08PVvFJCXRsWe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:51:04PM +0100, Emanuel Berg wrote: > tomas wrote: >=20 > >> 0 is not natural according to this source: > >>=20 > >> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/data/numbers.txt > > > > That source is wrong half of the time. >=20 > The sources for the source are: >=20 > https://davenport.libguides.com/math-skills-overview/basic-operations/s= ets > https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/find-the-first-n-pure-numbers/ Extend your sources. They aren't wrong, but they aren't right either. I recommend at least skimming this discussion, which gives an idea on how diverse the whole thing is: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/283/is-0-a-natural-number The most interesting answers, which parody what has been happening here are those which say "it's this (or that) way because I learnt it in school, dammit".=20 Cheers --=20 t --Xmx08PVvFJCXRsWe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCY8vxDgAKCRAFyCz1etHa RikSAJ98W947awPmBr83Ca3jgdTNXt1cQACffXGmZACFQR618yh+Rv+xT/U0X80= =ceNN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Xmx08PVvFJCXRsWe--