From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Calling a function with undefined symbol Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 21:47:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87o7toi68e.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87tu3egbj2.fsf@web.de> <87sfixfp5p.fsf@dataswamp.org> <874jvd9eb1.fsf@web.de> <87leonbzy1.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87v8nqlpjk.fsf@web.de> <87wn86ogg8.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87a65178ah.fsf@web.de> <87bkphusl4.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hPiA46G6D3JZS9d5" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39176"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 08 21:48:37 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1osVWP-0009xw-7R for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 21:48:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osVVk-0000bm-OX; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 15:47:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osVVj-0000bV-HG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 15:47:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osVVh-0004WW-Jh for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 15:47:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=co07ejB3gRpe7aHKex33uvTAnY3BXKyKjHrVC9HbTr0=; b=Sy5xAqyiC5NyhHjArMkD3G64tI gP19w+yIkfZtVRFblBovUYwJ8dP19xWCw6ztawv9FdBCtD+biNmY/UF8pQmyC3Nn8eWEyuSi8mQ8T /knkTU5okWpd/ZC+pfj3g7jSHmoCo/I9+RT7AONc8ehdJIYee0VAUsLkmv70Yu9nNroWRb7FzK1vI sHTIjv2wgiyFpvWB8WmQQUAy/5pKOujU6M6qiqAavCLMOtsSzEloY7Qk7EpxjkWYYquM9P22B1oi9 GiaK/ScgQwLbF4TR1pKtMmqwrHIPWI3s71R3HewC/Gz0t5KfGdgJloEsZkqTOWQxympf5R6BUXnct c0lCAvHg==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1osVVe-00008Q-PU for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 21:47:50 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bkphusl4.fsf@web.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:140845 Archived-At: --hPiA46G6D3JZS9d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 08:57:59PM +0100, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > writes: >=20 > > Now would that be more fun if Elisp did tail call optimization? > > > > Let me try in Guile: > > > > scheme@(guile-user)> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) > > > > Yes, it is :) >=20 > Impressive - it just produces a bit of heat over time, but it doesn't > consume memory. To be more precise, it always consumes the same memory. Perhaps the bits become somewhat worn out in that place ;-P Cheers --=20 t --hPiA46G6D3JZS9d5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCY2rAcAAKCRAFyCz1etHa RgRKAJ4pQuhJQreomHxnt9R8MhQThv5+KACfb3jPoyJlmEl50wiWw+h7Uv1w6mY= =OgNH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hPiA46G6D3JZS9d5--