From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Calling a function with undefined symbol Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 20:15:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zgd9ot4p.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87r0yk9tw6.fsf@web.de> <87o7toi68e.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87tu3egbj2.fsf@web.de> <87sfixfp5p.fsf@dataswamp.org> <874jvd9eb1.fsf@web.de> <87leonbzy1.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87v8nqlpjk.fsf@web.de> <87wn86ogg8.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87a65178ah.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uY01SzamYUa6TGxM" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38049"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 08 20:16:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1osU4q-0009gH-Bm for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 20:16:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osU4L-00059i-O5; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 14:15:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osU4K-00059Z-G8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 14:15:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osU4I-0006bR-No for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 14:15:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=imCh4hrzxn48ZEFQQuwfeMYjQY2eX79JmHouDBJsyfA=; b=oFermd+nTZVKATvYe1CKi8K+am I66SYGD1y/NwT25VtLxejMEbpwJnWtjEkQLK3Pkf+d1HOpzZy2Q0TT9FHug8+pD6D8UeUO8HsjIXq WrTrdMO9qSo+oqqMyxD+Js3AvaIojFVusbY+CIEE4UKBxb0t8xOJyStG9Bjnl95W1vMuTLAWa6jPb o3LRybTA235SbWzq2vLd0Dpa7njHuf4903MR/2uo6cq9rZAPO4zsgPXxgLZ8dDc8C2SG2eYPEb1S1 hW5Y2IwH04H9lQHEdfXA5aWQs5338HlaNnQMcUK12frosoaYfNLf1UF7pNpvrvLICByhDLLCmtvhG asAHVomA==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1osU4E-0008Le-Nf for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 20:15:26 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a65178ah.fsf@web.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:140843 Archived-At: --uY01SzamYUa6TGxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Emanuel Berg writes: >=20 > > > In my objective point of view the canonical person for the > > > task is...Emanuel Berg! (not kidding) > > > > Okay, I'll get right to it! >=20 > Good. You may add >=20 > (d) What's the return value of evaluating the expression >=20 > (funcall > (lambda (x) (funcall x x)) > (lambda (x) (funcall x x))) Now would that be more fun if Elisp did tail call optimization? Let me try in Guile: scheme@(guile-user)> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Yes, it is :) Cheers --=20 t --uY01SzamYUa6TGxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCY2qqzgAKCRAFyCz1etHa RsWYAJ92nrHjOCXIN+3bpLoG3ACjmGEGzgCfZ8XBxD5tQZXM4ZlCh475ar0XJOg= =Lcaa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uY01SzamYUa6TGxM--