From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Closures - do you understand them well? Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:33:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87cz8suv92.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87pmcpo1wz.fsf@web.de> <87pmcpm9vn.fsf@web.de> <87sfg8xcps.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87h6wmacdn.fsf@web.de> <87v8krlo9q.fsf@dataswamp.org> <875ycrsd2c.fsf@web.de> <87ilfowq63.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/MD66jp/BQTsRzHf" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10211"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 27 09:34:16 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pWYxb-0002S0-O5 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:34:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWYxI-0000eH-1z; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 03:33:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWYxF-0000d4-Tg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 03:33:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWYxD-0004ey-5D for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 03:33:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=eG1xkcoNaeF5O0/Ohb5dDIdvnODSCEQeBtsKKSavmAc=; b=qQPj0hdyZYE+KgCxEb2NSdjo1o rOCdKz0bNed3s5ndjNJWG11lU4GVORRIGKqnow743oZu3RO/RUuO6IDGTu1oHqi5ViMPiQWj8+yc8 23Ren/u9TLJiyCtfCatxzELgXe1XEnKexSmxwTqokq8r7u+umfNi26l/aA0O+VJfl8PdsBdZU7TrM HB11IJsdyftjK7c6NPJf1gy5NuHNUbxOs+xCakw6JUDrjDQHSuBo8AUQ6Se+H7hvmlrTv5q6Vnzlu h0kasadSQkL3Wn362H+IBIrADxKYEdq2R8xQUFQvJnPqierjz3y16hyjCVM8qTHJd9WdwxCxq7NtP lGAjxi1w==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWYx9-00053j-Pu for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:33:47 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ilfowq63.fsf@dataswamp.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142866 Archived-At: --/MD66jp/BQTsRzHf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 01:45:56PM +0100, Emanuel Berg wrote: [...] > Maybe some optimizations to be made with lexical/static > because of the increased enclosure (ha), modularity > and predictability? That's the biggest part of it, yes: the compiler has a chance of knowing what's "going on" and whether "someone else" will be able to change a variable's value "behind its back" or not. Cheers -=20 t --/MD66jp/BQTsRzHf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCY/xq6wAKCRAFyCz1etHa RiDhAJ0bTvC7ddyV8R4Ed6vZ02cNSkXSnQCdHtF39WcP/ddwPvMFqoabz598y2I= =Di9a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/MD66jp/BQTsRzHf--