From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Elston Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Subject Namimg Convention anyone? Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 19:27:57 -0000 Organization: Advantest R&D Center Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <409FB039.6060301@yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084217984 4733 80.91.224.253 (10 May 2004 19:39:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 19:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 10 21:39:35 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BNGch-0002fw-00 for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 21:39:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BNGUr-0005tj-Az for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 May 2004 15:31:29 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Original-Lines: 25 Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:123110 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:18400 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:18400 Kevin Rodgers wrote in news:409FB039.6060301 @yahoo.com: > Mark Elston wrote: > > OK. I'm starting to get annoyed with the SPAM starting to show up in > > this newsgroup. Since this is an unmoderated group could we all agree > > to use a naming convention for posting to allow us to easily weed out > > the wheat from the chaff? > > ... > > There is already a convention: > > Subject: foo.el > Subject: foo.el 1.2 > Subject: foo.el 1.2 --- Frobnicate oedipal ouvre, with font-lock support > OK. Yeah, I knew that but I was really looking for something a little more amenable to automation. I suppose this is easy enough to recognize by sight but is a little harder to describe in a filter file (I use XNews). Sorry for the original rant but when more than 50% of the messages in the newsgroup are spam I get a little testy. Mark