From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Masterson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: package-autoremove ? Looking like a bug... Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 14:02:59 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24332"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Pankaj Jangid Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 03 23:51:26 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kDx8f-0006Bd-Lx for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 23:51:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48846 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDx8e-0007Pp-Nl for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:51:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDwNv-0007rX-Fp for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-dm6nam12olkn2103.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.22.103]:17185 helo=NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDwNt-000851-Ff for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:03:06 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=iKpfRscu68DcBAtGSR+5iLHhBYGBNVxwckmrGJbbfIKm8JPGo2eHoV6jf6+xTQMFoLMSlcsjTcrZJMmNyxqCFRxopPWIC7JThMJUQE97EiReAWIElAzj5UTlMa13iNAwj0aOuDosFw3KYAqBZvlpUelAYk0pHpF8YXS/XXiDrRxW97j7xmt70SV0Upw95tdj1E1aEZnduopnUC+bXEOq7HGAm1WC119kJ7UkAz+iRi7LVUkCpoSzubJ+OYXz9NyOyCE1fVbAlZGOWmms42X24GUFtWWSllhJ7Yv4b3pbw31lp/uT5O8HL/YUQtIWZB3Ac8nim7KwHuq5LAqYSt0mQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=v5U0NN/8enqgMzbUhcSEUshe6jIk7C9iCni9DdbcXRw=; b=iOoTt864cFiGPWFaQbPrpPJ/wA9NUClDiKeXSATWYi8n1cPptYB/ObTALM5iX8TCf5f7826vwMXEXDRcyN01Qtj3EsW8drwhqhR6XMxWivK7JEEa7MC7zeid7Awx9J3q8a+oO13wGU93z2JrIKrjIXMTPEXdRMNE7232tA1WMQn0ZzMPGglMBXmToZVGLniUnu/KHtJ+41qjrTk6ksrhFK1RzvaN2HKAGqXxw5GHIQMWHhatkFtUPp4rO2qYR0VsNxEyTUy45rxz4njJXTfAiXq1cSFES+yMqV1qp+0ngjdLQWBKBAssg+FAJDufZZcxfSe6LKy4csAxqCftzEXOuQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=v5U0NN/8enqgMzbUhcSEUshe6jIk7C9iCni9DdbcXRw=; b=SqAyveQOCv0W55iHPg+c7LptJejRU3xDKGjD5E8yikhEMlYK7G7+PO7uIUtNxOKhVicyQ4ZGFfzAi6FnDU8A1bVelKe1OPdwoOP2oC7ELFNdHI8W7I+quFqYzXz0KBccax7xvg6S32aKtSQSPZaCtPxjaZhc2zxFCfcDql27/o72nPRZSbPzIb1hTcKKAhv6xmkj3kcvFSghn4SRAYkEM7aYkTc1tux7qxTQXgFUC1tRP0TF6v0FPQS74o4TmzFIirROv/CoDWqi793jraW4KTwTXP19jZM8L9aMxuWB6/GDcHgOMOvghTCZ4VY0F/Muptura7SF0gBfqX/fp8a7iw== Original-Received: from CO2PR04CA0092.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:104:6::18) by CH2PR13MB3815.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:91::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.5; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 21:03:04 +0000 Original-Received: from MW2NAM10FT022.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:104:6:cafe::57) by CO2PR04CA0092.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:104:6::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 21:03:04 +0000 Original-Received: from SN6PR01MB4493.prod.exchangelabs.com (2a01:111:e400:7e87::4d) by MW2NAM10FT022.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e87::357) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 21:03:03 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:646C24DA9DE3684D51EF8C88E84D8DFC9D7E77DCA4B5BF7F4CC909768EDB641B; UpperCasedChecksum:04E0FBE0F9A57234B3793C9D547EA29C9C81A933E055F3ECA793D4474C36F6E7; SizeAsReceived:7578; Count:47 Original-Received: from SN6PR01MB4493.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::e9e0:fc48:a05:7c59]) by SN6PR01MB4493.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::e9e0:fc48:a05:7c59%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3326.025; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 21:03:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Pankaj Jangid's message of "Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:08:12 +0530") X-ClientProxiedBy: BYAPR01CA0008.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a02:80::21) To SN6PR01MB4493.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:ef::28) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <87ft7ylgjg.fsf_-_@outlook.com> X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Original-Received: from 255.255.255.255 (255.255.255.255) by BYAPR01CA0008.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a02:80::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 21:03:03 +0000 X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <87ft7ylgjg.fsf_-_@outlook.com> X-TMN: [ie/tiTxz9A3ilKpbvQ3KJvDAYjCCuAFwDx6yRxbwr1I6WUSPKv76TLSL7Gnj0+mq] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 47 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: c4315397-1288-44b8-f7c4-08d8504cbfa7 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CH2PR13MB3815: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: Rss0QQqX34LB1YpdjHZGY2UOqi7l3hnIO6FTvyMJ0usT9BD6MBA8O6qgZ6N+G24pFcvMG6QSOHwctZm1HXQLfs8+TKGedNpeBQ4WCt6w0BpVkP9ElBeWuJM5vpQJBztSwGRD7UX0srSlJYa5DSnVVOi9+A/dtGbB5/Hb4Y18wnZWtqFEAyCeFFNgQQTlPiMdF9ZztIJYsDxleNxvek7dOg== X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: KyPmqxFxzmr67HWoHlu+QlMsFAVFltOHIAQh/ZgIbAhHGca2Jvx6XElb/RaSSdXVZzNjb7HSLzXFl/BKRTrD6Ak5Zo0CHsu6RzjozG2w26UNGpmSyk0n6b+j22dWNE9Qa7MZ7w/qGwXpgEyQME4turdKOUzIKa7+mpiXQZQGC9mZm2ZAhj9+vQSMQWt9fVnY1jJ/w/Sy2SZ0PhdQ9xeQMA== X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c4315397-1288-44b8-f7c4-08d8504cbfa7 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Sep 2020 21:03:03.8976 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MW2NAM10FT022.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CH2PR13MB3815 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=40.92.22.103; envelope-from=dsmasterson92630@outlook.com; helo=NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/03 17:03:04 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Windows NT kernel [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -5 X-Spam_score: -0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:123943 Archived-At: Pankaj Jangid writes: > David Masterson writes: > >> The package-autoremove is giving a list of packages to be removed, but >> many of the packages seem to be dependents of other packages, so I >> don't want to remove them. How does package-autoremove decide on >> which packages can be removed? Can I force it to keep some of the >> packages? > > I have faced a similar issue when I was re-writing my init.el to > modularize using use-package. It split the big file into tiny little > files. > > In my case, the problem was that the packages where installed as a > dependency and actual call (use-package package-name :ensure t) for > those packages were not encountered by the interpreter. > > I debugged it using a very inefficient method. Commented out the > (require ...) statements from the init.el and uncommented one-by-one to > find the problem. Sounds like you're onto something. I recently started using use-package and the problem began after that. What you're suggesting is that you have to install packages with the package manager and then use use-package to load them. Anyone else seen this? -- David Masterson