From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: face at point Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:31:13 +0200 (IST) Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037684199 9585 80.91.224.249 (19 Nov 2002 05:36:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 05:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18E13t-0002UL-00 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 06:36:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18E0zf-0003EL-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 00:32:15 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18E0yj-0002Qp-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 00:31:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18E0yg-0002KI-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 00:31:16 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18E0yf-0002AD-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 00:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA10132 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:31:13 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:3741 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:3741 On 19 Nov 2002, Miles Bader wrote: > it's possible that this _has_ been discussed > and no consensus to change it reached, but Emacs (and Gnus in > particular) has so many different faces that maybe everybody found it > easier to change it personally rather than to argue about it. IIRC, the discussions were only about the standard faces. Faces defined by Gnus and other optional packages were not among them, to the best of my (failing) memory.