From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: uzibalqa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: [External] : Re: Pressing ? does not allow window scrolling through the list of info commands Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 15:04:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83bkgoguea.fsf@gnu.org> <837crcgra6.fsf@gnu.org> <14KP-ia-06yjAh-_mSMzvtPr1r24o2Csrt1AZWdGWTTN2OfCHNEcTkbmUFJaAeHHZZmkW5S3QypOZdaAMZG9RnU-ApcaB8nsuaTXFphsZGg=@proton.me> <0fdTAqyLLU2GmTGs9PSCc_J37QDw9Ty04TrbeEtKGFcGQs3AbhmyMbhew_t8uHIjg50CDG1uR28pV1rWjnD4omMWAZoBZHoY9RFP_v9qV2g=@proton.me> <83lefrg9w6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20036"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 07 17:05:37 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qHn1c-0004wS-Vi for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 17:05:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qHn1K-0006kh-1S; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 11:05:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qHn1G-0006kT-7B for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 11:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4325.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qHn1D-0001ZQ-A7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 11:05:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=p25fxjkt75aqtp5tss5l6zvovm.protonmail; t=1688742308; x=1689001508; bh=AspAcG0867tU6lgyMj40vxQbwT81J8GQsj/1fvf0lDM=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=FCXf0lt/2JjsldfgcsPSMB+rUI3wSaXb5ziqy+p1+oTe41XD8UrAge/ZFQS3VL2wJ gc3W21Ft5W2DrozkFoH4CaJ7riDamoHWcJPyDBEGLYJ7896c3Xi67GJLEzXjxDZzgs tB7japk1GZJgQe3pbiKVMQIn0u0rVWjrcAPl4giwOhLd+G9TRx7bef8R9UsRBaZng1 h/GCKNHd5rKO2gObYeNP3hPwg6kiqWiqhYXl+gSuuLeI/Lci6PBeN5mLEVmP6s5t/c vk0vWUKVy1MHIYNYttGNGMhHN58zrl1rlrifaB5uFBgGRqW+xyh9lDAnnECf8IaoLT YU3zDa6s+OZSA== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 52887082:user:proton Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.25; envelope-from=uzibalqa@proton.me; helo=mail-4325.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:144166 Archived-At: ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, July 8th, 2023 at 2:58 AM, Drew Adams = wrote: > > > It nothing comes to mind, press "?" again. > >=20 > > Not being able to operate upon the '?' buffer is very problematic. >=20 >=20 > If it were "very problematic" for users in > general then it's very likely that would have > become apparent to others sometime in the 40 > years that this UI has existed, and it would > have been discussed and addressed somehow. >=20 > Maybe you meant to say that you found it very > problematic for you. Fair enough; noted here. Yes, it is from my experience playing with it like a newbie. I do not see that people use it much and newbies are unlikely to send bug reports to improve it. =20 > But again, please suggest specific improvements > using `M-x report-emacs-bug'. That's more > likely to get you satisfaction or a better > understanding.