From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hugo Wolf Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs 21.3.50 on OS X 10.2.2 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:58:20 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <33a4f8d2.0211122251.1c92698@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037192888 7213 80.91.224.249 (13 Nov 2002 13:08:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18BxFW-0001s5-00 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:08:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18BxH5-0004KZ-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:09:43 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!sccrnsc04.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Darwin) Original-Lines: 31 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.31.41.137 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com Original-X-Trace: sccrnsc04 1037192300 66.31.41.137 (Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:58:20 GMT) Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:58:20 GMT Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:106998 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:3551 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:3551 In article , Joseph Kiniry wrote: > I did a full update last night and rebuilt for 10.2.2 without an > issue as well. Perhaps a full removal of your sandbox and checking > out the repository again will help? That's a good point; I should have mentioned this. In my successful build I did a complete new checkout from scratch of the 11-01 sources, rather than trying to reuse my earlier checkout (from late October). > I have an X11 build of Emacs installed via Fink as well, BTW. My > two fink targets that drive my entire fink install are emacs (to get > emacs, all dependent libs, and X11) and sawfish (to get the Gnome > transitive closure). Software package management systems like fink are just Good Things in general - no other motivation needed imo. All sorts of useful tools are easily installed this way: anacron, blackbox, cdrtools, dlcompat, ghostscript, gnome, gtk+, kde, lame, ncftp, rxvt, slang/slrn, stunnel, tcltk, w3m, xemacs, etc etc plus the libs and headers they depend on. Some of these require osx-specific patches, which fink provides (no sense in reinventing those wheels). Some don't, but it still seems silly to me to build and install them in an ad hoc manual way when a nice version-tracking and dependency-management system is available. Not using fink in osx isn't quite as odd as not using rpm in RedHat, but it's close...