From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hugo Wolf Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: installing emacs and X11 on OS X Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:39:38 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87elah9ril.fsf@bundalo.shootybangbang.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035643341 11410 80.91.224.249 (26 Oct 2002 14:42:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 185S8p-0002xe-00 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:42:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 185S7u-0000bC-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:41:22 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!attla2!ip.att.net!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Darwin) Original-Lines: 21 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.31.41.137 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com Original-X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1035643178 66.31.41.137 (Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:39:38 GMT) Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:39:38 GMT Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:106417 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:2967 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:2967 In article , Eli Zaretskii wrote: > It didn't disturb me. As someone who knows a bit about Emacs > development in this area, I was trying to help you construct a .emacs > that would be less prone to future changes in functionality.... So tell me: what iyo is the right test for "set variables and add key bindings so that the l&f of emacs is a little closer to the standard aqua l&f for text processing if and only it's running in aqua"? If you have a test for this that you think is more appropriate than (eq window-system 'mac), please share it and I assure you I'll thank you for it and I'll use it. If you don't, just admit you made a mistake and move on. That's what grownups do. > I'm sorry if my attempts to help annoyed you. Arrogance annoys me.