From: Adam <a24061@void.yahoo.void.com>
Subject: Re: emacs or xemacs?
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:51:02 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <GBCf9.8567$kj1.64351252@news-text.cableinet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.1031674809.15931.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 17:18, Aurelio wrote:
> Hello!!! First of all, you must be patient with my english writing...
> Thanks!!!!
> I am going to use emcas. I usually use VIM but now it´s time to
> change... And here´s my first ask: emacs or xemacs??? What is the
> difference?? I think emacs21 have a good graphic display... But is
> xemacs more usefull???
> Thanks
If you have to use a Windoze system, XEmacs is easier to install. But if
you're using Cygwin it's not difficult to install GNU Emacs. On a proper
OS, they're both about the same to install. (Most Linux distros come with
both now.)
But GNU Emacs is the One True Emacs!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-11 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1031674809.15931.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-10 17:34 ` emacs or xemacs? Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 18:57 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:04 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-09-10 20:40 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:48 ` No HTML mails in Gnus (was: emacs or xemacs?) Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 21:06 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 19:05 ` emacs or xemacs? Stefan Monnier <foo@acm.com>
2002-09-11 7:51 ` Adam [this message]
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:34 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-11 10:35 ` Sacha Chua
2002-09-11 22:25 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 8:29 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-12 9:14 ` Zhongtao Zhu
2002-09-12 14:23 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 19:33 ` maierh
2002-09-12 15:51 ` D. Goel
2002-09-11 21:36 ` Rodney Sparapani
2005-05-22 21:14 Emacs or XEmacs? JS
2005-05-22 21:28 ` David Kastrup
2005-05-22 23:30 ` Tim Johnson
2005-05-23 5:23 ` It's me FKtPp ;)
2005-05-23 16:09 ` Drew Adams
2005-05-23 18:23 ` Alan Mackenzie
[not found] <mailman.1031732603.1996.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-14 8:33 ` emacs or xemacs? A. L. Meyers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-10 16:18 Aurelio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='GBCf9.8567$kj1.64351252@news-text.cableinet.net' \
--to=a24061@void.yahoo.void.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).