From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: maximum buffer size exceeded
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:59:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1IT9Ss-0004zR-5Y@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873axt1e6d.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
The only drawback I can see is that Lisp_Objects have to be allocated
on 16 byte boundaries rather than the current 8 byte boundary, so a
little space may be wasted (and maybe not...).
For cons cells and floats, it would mean half the space is wasted.
Markers and symbols and miscs will also waste space, but a smaller
fraction.
It would be useful to calculate the expected amount of waste in some
real Emacs jobs, and compare that with the total memory usage.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-06 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-02 6:44 maximum buffer size exceeded Daniel C. Bastos
2007-09-02 11:59 ` Emilio Lopes
2007-09-02 21:39 ` Daniel C. Bastos
2007-09-03 8:18 ` Tim X
2007-09-03 12:52 ` Daniel C. Bastos
2007-09-03 19:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-04 11:07 ` Johan Bockgård
[not found] ` <mailman.254.1188847491.18990.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2007-09-04 12:13 ` Giorgos Keramidas
2007-09-04 14:48 ` Peter Dyballa
[not found] ` <mailman.308.1188917334.18990.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2007-09-04 18:13 ` Emilio Lopes
2007-09-04 19:10 ` Giorgos Keramidas
2007-09-04 20:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-05 12:37 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-09-05 15:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-09-05 15:14 ` Jason Rumney
2007-09-05 16:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-09-06 4:59 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2007-09-06 5:44 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-02 19:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-03 23:25 ` Glenn Morris
2007-09-04 8:20 ` Tim X
2007-09-04 17:31 ` Glenn Morris
2007-09-05 8:20 ` Tim X
2007-09-04 17:53 ` Daniel C. Bastos
[not found] <mailman.3364.1083718441.1061.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2004-05-05 2:00 ` Maximum " Kin Cho
2004-05-05 3:26 ` Harish Narayanan
[not found] ` <mailman.3382.1083727713.1061.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2004-05-05 5:18 ` Kin Cho
2004-05-05 9:36 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2004-05-05 5:53 ` Marco Gidde
2004-05-05 11:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <mailman.3431.1083752452.1061.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2004-05-05 11:45 ` Marco Gidde
2004-05-06 6:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <mailman.3625.1083821602.1061.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2004-05-06 8:21 ` Marco Gidde
2004-05-06 12:12 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2004-05-05 15:56 ` Miles Bader
2004-05-05 19:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-06 6:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-05 17:16 ` Michael Welsh Duggan
[not found] ` <mailman.3511.1083777609.1061.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2004-05-05 19:37 ` upro
2004-05-05 5:50 ` Matthieu Moy
2004-05-05 19:31 ` Stefan Monnier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-05 0:52 Harish Narayanan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1IT9Ss-0004zR-5Y@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=storm@cua.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).