From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nospam@dev.null (Alexey Pustyntsev) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: rmail Setup Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 06:25:31 +1100 Message-ID: References: <1179409310.620539.228430@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1179861309.907251.54120@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <87veehhn2e.fsf@gmail.com> <200705260930.l4Q9U57u009530@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180293585 10879 80.91.229.12 (27 May 2007 19:19:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 19:19:45 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 27 21:19:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HsOHI-0001AI-2j for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 21:19:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HsOHH-0007oZ-Hv for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 15:19:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HsOH1-0007mw-Ko for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 15:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HsOGv-0007Zn-Ow for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 15:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HsOGv-0007ZT-IO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 15:19:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.242.74.155] (helo=sycore.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HsOGv-0001NW-6E for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 15:19:21 -0400 Original-Received: by sycore.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id 7A0D31611B; Sun, 27 May 2007 23:18:52 +0400 (MSD) Original-Received: from sycore.org (d2032.ys.dialup.sakhalin.ru [87.251.96.32]) by sycore.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DC715B25 for ; Sun, 27 May 2007 23:18:49 +0400 (MSD) Original-Received: from alexey by sycore.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HsOMt-0003gX-2Z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 06:25:31 +1100 User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 Emacs/22.0.95.1 In-Reply-To: <200705260930.l4Q9U57u009530@localhost.localdomain> (Xavier Maillard's message of "Sat\, 26 May 2007 11\:30\:05 +0200") X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:44486 Archived-At: Xavier Maillard writes: > Also consider "getmail" over "fetchmail". > > What are the advantages of getmail over fetchmail ? > > Xavier I don't think it's the right list for this discussion. Briefly, getmail seems to be user-friendlier and more reliable (esp over slow connections). Please, see getmail faqs for details. -- Rgds Alexey Today is Pungenday, the 2nd day of Confusion in the YOLD 3173