From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Heime Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Get buffer unto a new frame Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:10:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <63aR95kjBnrEzFE6lJM9suzyL-9i_WCsNCxKxYgFrpfCNKRsd7a3VasrDsShzVumLgkPHW3JpekQ2AVAtbwlE4nDFCmBMaGx4OcGNTeLpWU=@protonmail.com> <2a718b7a-ad27-16d5-7f91-27708bbbf5c8@magnaspesmeretrix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1322"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: PierGianLuca Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 18 16:13:04 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qX0Dm-000AdN-W9 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:13:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qX0By-0007e5-2Y; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qX0Bm-0007RN-78 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:10:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4324.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.24]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qX0Bj-0005vT-2k for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:10:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1692367852; x=1692627052; bh=cveOS0mKgClrTUhqLTKPyi73Uu7IxEOnt20malByjb8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=hAGQ0OX7rf3o3rLNa+MwYShVcvERypNlqkcYmdO42U3y4LP3I8F6sYkDBq9q+aJII aew/s5xPmlvYQqbdKHcjIjLO7b6W8iSCVTewWSU9n12AJRUZ4weuHUc493FQu6Fy11 kOLk268mcfVHWWrAkPMK7ztQSz66d588RPAkktzXKTrjcGo2fMFpxYle4YL4LWmdi8 EWorbzU6oWI8z0I9zqCpIOOE/a5plUuW1gZAega46g+XFmQ9vaHa0XjfvFyq5MTFZj hVVINN3qc4922MbLCWojtyr0MNmYq7EAg/U9UxyJbLwRpmASYXGebmK6ZzW9pAFWzr ERYV9reBVUqvQ== In-Reply-To: <2a718b7a-ad27-16d5-7f91-27708bbbf5c8@magnaspesmeretrix.org> Feedback-ID: 57735886:user:proton Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.24; envelope-from=heimeborgia@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4324.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:144871 Archived-At: ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, August 19th, 2023 at 1:57 AM, PierGianLuca wrote: > Hi Heime, >=20 > Just wanted to say I completely understand you. I've had to deal with sim= ilar=20 > conundrums for many years. My personal experience is that (in my case) th= ere's=20 > simply no best rule. I've had situations in which I needed copies of a bu= ffer=20 > in different frames (especially if the frames live in different virtual d= esktops),=20 > or copies within the same frame but different windows; different buffers = in different=20 > frames, different buffers in the same frame, and whatnot... Then, one should have the capability to have a number of possibilities.=20 =20 > For me the optimal solution has been to set up quicker keyboard shortcuts= =20 > (avoiding all longer "C-x ..." ones) to ease up this kind of configuratio= n changes. >=20 > Cool if you find a standard solution for the kind of work you do. Perhaps as you say, I might require different possibilities in future. By detach I usually mean "send it away", meaning that the buffer is sent away to a new frame, leaving nothing behind. One can have multiple windows of the same buffer, is that correct ?=20 Can one remove all windows showing same buffer in some frame ? > I'm really happy for the extreme flexibility that Emacs gives in this reg= ard! >=20 > Cheers, > Luca