From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: RE: setnu.el / setnu+.el
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:57:42 -0800
Message-ID: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICMELEDAAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
References: <dohrcb$ud9$1@sea.gmane.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135375088 32588 80.91.229.2 (23 Dec 2005 21:58:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:58:08 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 23 22:58:05 2005
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EpuvL-0003uM-2W
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:58:03 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EpuwP-00061E-Ao
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:59:09 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EpuwB-00060T-De
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:58:55 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Epuw9-0005zs-II
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:58:54 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Epuw9-0005zp-EW
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:58:53 -0500
Original-Received: from [141.146.126.228] (helo=agminet01.oracle.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EpuvV-0005Vu-OF
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:58:13 -0500
Original-Received: from rgmsgw301.us.oracle.com (rgmsgw301.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.50])
	by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id
	jBNLvj6x027217
	for <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:57:45 -0600
Original-Received: from rgmsgw301.us.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rgmsgw301.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id
	jBNLviv8019674
	for <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:57:44 -0700
Original-Received: from dradamslap (dradams-lap.us.oracle.com [130.35.177.126])
	by rgmsgw301.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with SMTP id
	jBNLvhNl019666
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)
	for <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:57:44 -0700
Original-To: <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <dohrcb$ud9$1@sea.gmane.org>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI=
X-Whitelist: TRUE
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:32194
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/32194>

Could someone please explain the relative advantages and disadvantages of
using margin vs overlay? What is expected to be gained by making a change to
using the margin?