From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Dyballa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Any advantages to recompile Emacs... Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:19:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232659493 19410 80.91.229.12 (22 Jan 2009 21:24:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Francis Moreau Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 22 22:26:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LQ73t-0002KG-N6 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:26:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LQ72c-0000Ci-8A for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:24:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQ6xz-0002p7-51 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQ6xx-0002mc-EP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:19:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36005 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LQ6xx-0002mM-9B for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:55595) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LQ6xw-0000BC-Uo for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp06.web.de (fmsmtp06.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.172]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB46FF6E84DA; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:19:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [91.35.202.165] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1LQ6xu-0001Fm-00; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:19:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Sender: Peter_Dyballa@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/2oEu8PMLQO5Olv88jSKsK8MuDPCyRVt7LgOyA mat1vnA6wYr/kWqf86ahgX+MASWkSyLnrVK0IRfRMTffzmg4S+ b74G82af2VZ0K4rdkytg== X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:61572 Archived-At: Am 22.01.2009 um 20:44 schrieb Francis Moreau: > emacs 22.2 with X support: ~ 8.0Mo > emacs 23 without X support: ~ 14.5Mo > > It's a huge difference, so now I'm wondering if I correctly built the > beast... > > Any Idea ? Think of Unicode (8 bit -> 32 bit)! And if your hardware is 64 bit, =20 then GNU Emacs could have been configured and compiled for this, =20 using pointers that large. Did you compile in debug information? (And =20= GTK also consumes lots of disk space, look at my GNU Emacs 21.3.50 =20 (also GCC 3.3)!) On my Mac the Emacsen have: 7,490,192 26 Dez 01:23 emacs-22.3 10,166,896 14 Jan 15:27 emacs-23.0.60 13,836,700 20 Jul 2008 emacs-21.3.50 -- Greetings Pete Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to =20 build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying =20= to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. =96 Rich Cook