unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Mastro <john.b.mastro@gmail.com>
To: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
Cc: hector <hectorlahoz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: unexpected byte-compiler behaviour
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:18:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOj2CQRV+m_85C10-NFi2RU8e6hqVSeZ+4Ueis-ZKbTNP8kCcw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170309174614.GA3572@workstation>

hector <hectorlahoz@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to compile a file and it's driving me crazy.
> At some point of the file I'm reading unexpected messages:
>
> lyqi.el:137:1:Warning: `(abbrev :initarg :abbrev)' is a malformed function
>
> There's something weird going on here. So I write a nonsense function call
> at top level:
> (djghalkjhg)
>
> The byte-compiler just skips this and keeps showing the first message.
>
> When I cut the file at this point the compiler says what I expect:
>
> tmp.el:136:1:Warning: the function `djghalkjhg' is not known to be defined.
>
> How can this be?
>
> This leads me to think that the parser is doing more than one pass since
> a text after this point is affecting compilation at this point.
>
> If this is true, what the heck is causing it to not report that
> function "djghalkjhg" is not defined?

In Emacs 25.1, I see the behavior you would expect. With this content in
a file test.el:

    ;; test.el

    ((abbrev :initarg :abbrev) 'foo)

    (djghalkjhg)

I call `byte-compile-file' and see these warnings:

    Compiling file /tmp/test.el at Thu Mar  9 10:14:23 2017
    Entering directory ‘/tmp/’
    test.el:3:1:Warning: ‘(abbrev :initarg :abbrev)’ is a malformed function

    In end of data:
    test.el:6:1:Warning: the function ‘djghalkjhg’ is not known to be defined.

Warnings don't cause the byte compiler to stop, so you should indeed see
both warnings, as I do.

        John



  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-09 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-09 17:46 unexpected byte-compiler behaviour hector
2017-03-09 18:18 ` John Mastro [this message]
2017-03-09 18:20   ` John Mastro
2017-03-09 19:17     ` hector
2017-03-09 19:25   ` hector
2017-03-09 21:55     ` John Mastro
2017-03-09 22:49       ` hector
2017-03-09 23:28         ` John Mastro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOj2CQRV+m_85C10-NFi2RU8e6hqVSeZ+4Ueis-ZKbTNP8kCcw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=john.b.mastro@gmail.com \
    --cc=hectorlahoz@gmail.com \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).