From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jai Dayal Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Different emacs arrangements in one session Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 00:04:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391231076 15530 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2014 05:04:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 05:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs To: Dan Espen Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 01 06:04:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Skz-0008To-0f for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 06:04:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59449 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Sky-0000ft-Ep for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 00:04:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Skm-0000fo-DK for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 00:04:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Skl-0006pC-AQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 00:04:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vb0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22c]:51838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Skl-0006p8-40 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 00:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f12so3461326vbg.17 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:04:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=fHul4+xNScAOy+UrdpfbO+QbT8RerxUOj+9Zj+ZOoBM=; b=XScP9Hre4TFwO2GMI8lDFzNS1oy9nN+GuxRjnCrswAoif8jiY9BHNCs71vbVUkCJEP mLpthwKJ/YHVl/OxI2XEdzsUCYkDstoaDEXe/IvpMsloabG1ajp3XLNnyud/sXeUigoa 3qHWNhPGaJCfAjuO6Etvn8+q3Yjl3YuB+0QuAY3dvohLOJ9c0wS8HMNRo2B1Z4+OIFpW lA4sug/nDUxY4pUJ7T0XLdpad8GXxh9noyTq/PtIpQLJjvXmqHPrLgAXOsUIgUga+t2q /n1ZNMNt4IyP1moGVRgg82FGzb8RJyGfY8BfIHuBHGZ5Lv0wbuUizjRGbxLPtXi7keLY F9vw== X-Received: by 10.58.69.111 with SMTP id d15mr19092882veu.3.1391231066525; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:04:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.221.42.10 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:04:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22c X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:95870 Archived-At: The problem is that this is a persistent problem amongst computer scientists and software engineers. They try to opine on small little details that actually never address the problem at hand. I asked a very specific question, and instead of getting an answer to that question, an assumption of "I know you're doing it wrong because I do it this way" was made and then the question never gets answered. On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Dan Espen wrote: > Jai Dayal writes: > > > Since you tried to be pedantic and not actually answer my question, > explain > > this: > > Still top posting? > > > I have code on machine 1. I make a change, compile it, and then git > commit > > it. > > > > On machine 2 and also on machine 3, I have to git pull, and then compile. > > > > Then I have to launch the codes that test it. Machine 1 runs something, > > machine 2 runs something, machine 3 runs something, etc. > > > > That's why I like having multiple terminals in my emacs session; in one > > frame I have all of my code buffers. In the other frame, I have all of my > > terminals (ssh'd into machine 2, machine 3 and one for machine 1). From > > there, I can launch the respective codes, git pull, and compile. > > > > You can't do that with M-x compile. > > > > So basically, you tried to be pedantic, and were *wrong* with your stupid > > suggestion. > > I see. > > Because you can't figure out how to run compiles and tests on remote > machines then it's impossible. > I wonder how I've been doing it all this time... > > You know, I saw your post and I pictured all these windows and jumping > around and all that stuff, and I thought, gee, I don't have that > problem, I think I might be able to help... > > Good luck. > > -- > Dan Espen >