Re: troubleshoot C-M-/ key binding (dabbrev-completion)

[Pierre Rouleau <prouleau001@gmail.com>]

Hi Michael,

Are you using Emacs in terminal mode?
If you are, it's quite possible that any key sequence that does not map to
ASCII Control characters will not work.
Note that C-\ is a valid ASCII Control code (hex byte value 0x5c).
And C-\ is not a valid ASCII control code.
Therefore Emacs, in terminal mode will not be able to recognize C-M-\

In graphics mode, Emacs will be able to identify C-M-\ as it will decode
the key sequence from the keyboard
directly and won't have to use a terminal emulator standard.

To see if a key sequence is recognized, type C-h k  followed by the key
sequence you're looking for.
Type C-h k C-M-\   to see the mapping of that key sequence and whether it
is recognized.

Hope this helps,

/Pierre



On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 5:00 PM Michael V. Antosha <
michael.antosha@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/21/24, Martin Marshall <law@martinmarshall.com> wrote:
> > "Michael V. Antosha" <michael.antosha@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> 3. Using C-M-/ (i.e. pressing Ctrl+Alt+SLASH) seems to have the same
> >> effect as M-/ (dabbrev-expand).
> >
> > What effect is that?
>
> I prepared a description of a test procedure to specify the effect,
> but I chose to skip sending it to keep my post shorter and because it
> seems unnecessary now (explained below).
>
>
> > Are you sure there are multiple completion candidates in the buffer?
>
> Yes.
>
>
> > If there's only one candidate in the buffer, `dabbrev-completion' will
> > immediately complete the word without bringing up a "*Completions*"
> > buffer.  That would look like the same thing `dabbrev-expand' does.
>
> I understand differences and similarities between the two commands, I
> first tested their behavior without key bindings, through M-x
> dabbrev-*
>
>
> > You can check which key Emacs thinks you pressed and which command it
> > called by invoking `view-lossage' (bound to "C-h l").
>
> Martin, thank you very much!
> That's really useful.
>
>
> What I'm seeing now proves my original suspicion:
>  - when I press "Alt+SLASH" emacs interprets it as ESC / [dabbrev-expand]
>  - when I press "Ctrl+Alt+SLASH" emacs interprets it, as ESC /
> [dabbrev-expand]
>
>  ESC / [dabbrev-expand]
>  C-h l [view-lossage]
>
> What could I do further to find out why these different combinations
> are understood by emacs as ESC / sequence?
>
>
> For comparison, Ctrl+Alt+BACKSLASH works fine.
> Below are keys/commands from C-h l after pressing Ctr+BACKSLASH, then
> Alt+BACKSLASH, then Ctrl+Alt+BACKSLASH:
>
>  C-\ [toggle-input-method]
>  ...
>  ESC \ [delete-horizontal-space]
>  ...
>  ESC C-\ [indent-region]
>  C-h l [view-lossage]
>
>
> I also tried to emulate C-M-/ by pressing ESC and then pressing Ctrl+SLASH,
> the result is quite unexpected:
>
>  ESC C-_ [nil]
>  C-h l [view-lossage]
>
>
> --
> Michael V. Antosha
>
>

-- 
/Pierre