From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Corwin Brust Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: bounds-of-thing-at-point for paragraphs Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 01:41:48 -0600 Message-ID: References: <8f2648d3-3bb0-4a02-a997-37c68124bed5@default> <87h7q8bdrx.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> <8ffe6c44-04bc-4d8c-876d-4d313de8f051@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40711"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Help Gnu Emacs mailing list , Robert Thorpe To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 03 08:43:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kZqyF-000AUd-NP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 08:43:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZqyE-0006sQ-M4 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 02:43:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZqxA-0006sF-4D for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 02:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:33004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZqx8-0005Lu-Ak for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 02:42:03 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 7so22764730ejm.0 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 23:42:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7ct/Y1Xu5g4heQyUl3S5AOCjFTs5JezxklPoh+zoFK4=; b=h4g7FOGAOnGUXKLsuDQYlPWX2UL+2us181QXKaukSyTB+de/KWKXSFt8IOuhzYubJ8 RgY4q5reZgE1bk1yK+DTO4l7GTiqC1moeHxeH3mlIVlGamtDQ5rRA+Pt1djkBV5aK8wv Omo6eYOVCM6b8eh8QCr7i4S/40WUGfSg7VkAaRYvbMJ7P7AQXz6tJ5aFcvz2fiGE6arp eRSfhkC8BIgsk0V0t3HBX1VzJbc4FuWLqF3O6kMvuSR5VD7Fbbq5emeD/PJllJ+MAwZa h+lGyT5ARpn+wx3twulSFmml1arFIlbioql1uw5V7UKG0lu4Ln6SI6UTI0FCR+mIGDRR lz/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533g4HigrefEHo1Ayo3asJylwyT+hJQ3CARF3i7Qxyct5AiwrRS1 wxGXKZNoqA9B68EVHxFhMh+y6OdyqHxr17iXHwM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzpVCbf/QnXTcp5eKgPn8DfNul7zqLva5JWj9qPXCjgynGKMD6npDxrfBZf5KNPAgMhD/lHqy5Xzcj6CyNpmg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6b86:: with SMTP id l6mr14463302ejr.524.1604389320403; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 23:42:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.49; envelope-from=mplscorwin@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-f49.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/03 02:42:00 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:124968 Archived-At: Thank you Stefan! On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:40 AM Stefan Kangas wrote: > > Corwin Brust writes: [...] > > So, likely regression in 27? I'm not able to check master sadly. > > See Bug#44384, fixed on master. FWIW, I can also repro this on 26.3 under -Q so I no longer think this is a regression for 27. Regards, Corwin