From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: can undo unamalgamation be turned off reliably and completely?
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:52:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8vw6j7Pq237NejAyWaAzoRT6-E6Hjv03MF=sgBwrEFSFg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJcAo8sATgfCd2agypG5sv8wSHutWBc0TWADKVfeJOWtwoMuOg@mail.gmail.com>
um, i meant if non-nil.
On 12/1/20, Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> wrote:
> (setq undo-auto-current-boundary-timer t) does not work in my emacs 25
> to turn off amalgamating.
>
> however, i /might/ have thought of a solution. called-interactively-p
> does not work reliably with defadvice, but this-command-keys might be
> a substitute. then maybe i can advise all amalgamating commands, and
> if nil, do undo-boundary. untested.
>
> and then when emacs 26 rolls around, i will try using (setq
> amalgamating-undo-limit 1). which i presume will work. thank you for
> all of your comments and, if any of you implemented turning off
> amalgamation, for doing that too.
>
>
> On 11/30/20, Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> wrote:
>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>
>>> > If you set this variable to, say, t, that should turn off this
>>> > feature.
>>> > Should exist in 25. May be named "undo-auto--current-boundary-timer"
>>> > there.
>>>
>>> No, this part of undo was all hard coded in C in Emacs-25.
>>
>> I see the timer variable being introduced in Lisp with this commit:
>>
>> | 44dfa86b7d382b84564d68472da1448d08f48129
>> | Author: Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk>
>> | AuthorDate: Thu Aug 6 21:33:58 2015 +0100
>> | Commit: Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@russet.org.uk>
>> | CommitDate: Thu Nov 12 21:06:05 2015 +0000
>> |
>> | Parent: 0aec2aaccd * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el: Simplify
>> describe-package-1
>> | Contained: emacs-25 emacs-26 master
>> | Follows: emacs-24.5-rc3-fixed (5481)
>> | Precedes: emacs-25.0.90 (1955)
>> |
>> | The heuristic that Emacs uses to add an `undo-boundary' has been
>> | reworked, as it interacts poorly with functions on `post-command-hook'
>> | or `after-change-functions'.
>>
>> Am I interpreting the "Contained" and "Precedes" fields wrong?
>>
>>> It got rewritten in Elisp for Emacs-26, which indeed makes it possible
>>> to
>>> change it much more easily.
>>
>> How would you deactivate it in versions not yet having the rewrite?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Michael.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> The Kafka Pandemic
>
> Please learn what misopathy is.
> https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html
>
--
The Kafka Pandemic
Please learn what misopathy is.
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-29 5:20 can undo unamalgamation be turned off reliably and completely? Samuel Wales
2020-11-29 8:57 ` Óscar Fuentes
2020-11-29 20:01 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-11-30 1:59 ` Samuel Wales
2020-11-30 3:08 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-11-30 4:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-11-30 16:42 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-12-02 4:51 ` Samuel Wales
2020-12-02 4:52 ` Samuel Wales [this message]
2020-12-03 3:42 ` Samuel Wales
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJcAo8vw6j7Pq237NejAyWaAzoRT6-E6Hjv03MF=sgBwrEFSFg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=samologist@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).