Re: The cons syntax format used by use-package.

[Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 9:21 PM Daniel Fleischer <danflscr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hongyi Zhao [2021-09-18 Sat 21:15] wrote:
>
> > (use-package ace-jump-mode
> >   :hook ((prog-mode text-mode) . ace-jump-mode))
> >
> > If I wanted to extend the above example with more hooks, which of the
> > following would be correct:
>
> The 2nd one, but why not
>
> (use-package ace-jump-mode
>   :hook ((prog-mode text-mode latex-mode) . ace-jump-mode))

This leads me to the following conclusion: Any number of pared nested
parentheses is equivalent in this case, i.e., all the following forms
are valid and equivalent:

:hook ((prog-mode text-mode latex-mode) . ace-jump-mode))
:hook (((prog-mode text-mode latex-mode) . ace-jump-mode)))
:hook ((((prog-mode text-mode latex-mode) . ace-jump-mode))))

But according to my tries, all the above three forms work, but the
following ones don't:

:hook (((((prog-mode text-mode latex-mode) . ace-jump-mode)))))
:hook ((((((prog-mode text-mode latex-mode) . ace-jump-mode))))))
[...]

Any hints for this phenomenon?

Regards, HZ